The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness since what may be known about God is plain to them because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen being understood from what has been made so that men are without excuse. For although they knew God they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles. Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen. Because of this. God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Furthermore since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God he gave them over to a depraved mind to do what ought not to be done. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness evil greed and depravity. They are full of envy murder strife deceit and malice. They are gossips slanderers. God-haters insolent arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are senseless faithless heartless ruthless. Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.- Romans 1:18-32 From here we know that homosexuality is wrong. And we do know that in all cultures homosexuality is an unnatural relationship between same sex. But that does not constitute as the only reason why I oppose the repealing of S377A. Another reason is also that the argument that S377A is unconstitutional and undemocratic is fundamentally flawed. It all boils down to the silent majority. Although people have been making noises to repeal S377A what makes you think that the majority actually wants the government to repeal S377A. And if so when the repeal got its way isn't that an undemocratic act since the majority had not been heard whether they want the repealing of S377A? If this is the case what gives the repealers the right to talk all about equal rights and democracy and constitution? And NTU has actually researched to reach the conclusion that majority of the Singapore wants to keep the penal code. Hence. I would say that the request for repeal is more of an unconstitutional and undemocratic act to Singaporeans than the decision to keep it. One argument that I have seen in this case is also that the homosexual community is growing in Singapore and that Singapore should follow international trends and whatever craps and nonsense you have on that online petition. Again the argument is fundamentally flawed. The basis of this entire saga is whether which decision is right and which decision is wrong. Ultimately which is the right thing to do? Perhaps let me go down to the consequences of repealing first. If repealed the fact remains that we will began to see an increasing number of homosexuals performing their acts in public (not sexual one). Another fact remains that it is common knowledge that Singaporean kids learn from what they see and Singaporean parents tend to be a bit bad on educating their kids. I see that repeal would mean that our next generation be exposed to a set of wrong behaviours and values. So is repealing the penal code the right thing to do? The answer is obviously no. The fact that homosexual community is growing despite the code is a sign that it will grow even more if the code is being repealed. It has serious moral implication to our society. Furthermore the fact that the community is increasing doesn't make it right to repeal the penal code. Just like the fact that more countries are repealing such code of similar nature it doesn't mean that we have to compromise on our moral values and repeal the code. Let me make one point clear. The code by itself does not condemn homosexuals but it does condemn homosexuality. I am not condemning the homosexuals but making a point against what they do.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

homosexual community bloggers, take a bit of your day to say Hi to Carli Banks. She has a nice new teaser video for you.
~Ray



comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

homosexual community visitors may need more sites to be happy.
Here are more adult websites to visit that are free for you...
exclusive video
web cams
strip blog
gay blog
tranny blog
nude pictures
shemale blog

feel free to browse around and maybe you will find something that you like?

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

"I'm sittin' in the phantom listening to opera gun is my bodyguard call me Kevin Costner" Well I'm not really sitting in a phantom. I'm actually sitting at the mazda dealership waiting for them to end working on my car. There was a woman in the waiting room with her kid,-- I think the kid was retarded. or should i say 'mentally challenged'. The kid couldn't conjecture a full sentence to save his life but he was beat of meaningless interjections. Anyway. I undergo to go domiciliate in a few weeks a journey I am none to thrilled about. I suppose it'll be nice to see the family. I just hate those damn tolls. But what are you going to do? These things are expected of you right. Its the price we pay to be part of any social construct whether it be a family a school job etc. Hmmmmm ok lets write about something semi important today no?I got in a recent argument with one of my black female friends about this whole down low brother issue. It seems to be flaring up in the media a lot. I hear about it on the net people gossip about it of course I never hear it through the venues I should just behind closed doors. My white roommate even made a joke about it.. so I suppose this topic is far widespread by now. So I've got two major issues with this whole concept. Firstly its being used to accuse the rising number of HIV cases in black women even though we've got no statistical bear witness that their is a correlation between the two AND the same thing is going on in the white community (except these men are being caught in mall bathrooms and a lot of these guys undergo been very high compose) yet we have no derogatory term for white men who do the same thing nor does the color community completely destroy these men. The senator that got caught (can't bequeath his name) still has his wife still has his kids and might undergo been able to deliver his job had he denied the scenario from the get go. But I tell lets get back to the HIV air. From what I can gather there is no statistical data on any correlation between drink low men and the go of new HIV cases. populate too often assume that because something 'sounds alter' or appears to 'make comprehend' that it must be the case. In general people hate homosexuals especially the black community the stigma that HIV is a homosexual disease has largely dissipated however people still feel this disease is their (the homosexual community's) fault. This faulty logic follows as such we've got color men who are lying and are really bisexual these black men are really lying to themselves and others and are really just homosexual they are responsible for the HIV epidemic because they are gay since they sleep with men who clearly spread the disease and also sleep with women they must be the cerebrate between those that would undergo the disease (gay men) and those that normally wouldn't have the disease (straight women). Whether you be to adjudge this rationalization or not more than likely this is how many of people especially those in the color community think. My problem.. where the fuck is the evidence? Could it quite possibly be just another thing other communities are using to further divide us to pit us against each other. For some cerebrate this issue is funny to everyone else and no one has enough sense to start questioning who coined this derogatory biased term for an challenge that has occurred since the birth of the human race. Why was the term coined why single out on black men where is the statistical data? Where are the facts. We can't change surface evaluate out if the earth is getting warmer or colder and its not like the earth is on the down low but somehow we've established 'come up known facts' about a group of populate we know nothing about because unlike global warming we don't undergo handful of dedicated scientists researching this topic. But what I find so remarkable is that if you were to ask people in the black community what the leading factors in the rise of HIV amongst black women many of them would probably inform the finger at brothers in prison OR on the downlow. This phenomenon has become widely accepted without any factual data however we actually have factual data for global warming (even though it still has determined anything btw i'm neither for or against this global warming thing its all for the sake of argument) and if you were to ask the same populate about global warming you'd get a bunch of mixed answers. Do you see the connection?I anticipate this really all comes approve to the fact that black males have enough stigma surrounding them already. If we really don't have any statistical data to back it up why act speculation as the truth. Just know its possible maybe change surface probable but until we know for sure we shouldn't let speculation affect judgement.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

"I'm sittin' in the phantom listening to opera gun is my bodyguard label me Kevin Costner" Well I'm not really sitting in a phantom. I'm actually sitting at the mazda dealership waiting for them to end working on my car. There was a woman in the waiting dwell with her kid,-- I think the kid was retarded. or should i say 'mentally challenged'. The kid couldn't formulate a full declare to deliver his life but he was full of meaningless interjections. Anyway. I have to venture home in a few weeks a journey I am none to thrilled about. I speculate it'll be nice to see the family. I just hate those arouse tolls. But what are you going to do? These things are expected of you right. Its the price we pay to be part of any social construct whether it be a family a school job etc. Hmmmmm ok lets write about something semi important today no?I got in a recent argument with one of my black female friends about this whole down low brother issue. It seems to be flaring up in the media a lot. I hear about it on the net people speak about it of cover I never hear it through the venues I should just behind closed doors. My color roommate even made a communicate about it.. so I suppose this topic is far widespread by now. So I've got two major issues with this whole concept. Firstly its being used to accuse the rising be of HIV cases in black women change surface though we've got no statistical evidence that their is a correlation between the two AND the same thing is going on in the color community (except these men are being caught in mall bathrooms and a lot of these guys have been very high compose) yet we undergo no derogatory term for white men who do the same thing nor does the color community completely undo these men. The senator that got caught (can't remember his label) still has his wife still has his kids and might undergo been able to save his job had he denied the scenario from the get go. But I digress lets get back to the HIV issue. From what I can gather there is no statistical data on any correlation between down low men and the go of new HIV cases. People too often assume that because something 'sounds right' or appears to 'make sense' that it must be the case. In command people dislike homosexuals especially the color community the stigma that HIV is a homosexual disease has largely dissipated however people still conclude this disease is their (the homosexual community's) accuse. This faulty logic follows as such we've got color men who are lying and are really bisexual these black men are really lying to themselves and others and are really just homosexual they are responsible for the HIV epidemic because they are gay since they sleep with men who clearly spread the disease and also sleep with women they must be the cerebrate between those that would undergo the disease (gay men) and those that normally wouldn't undergo the disease (straight women). Whether you want to admit this rationalization or not more than likely this is how many of people especially those in the black community think. My problem.. where the fuck is the evidence? Could it quite possibly be just another thing other communities are using to further divide us to pit us against each other. For some cerebrate this issue is funny to everyone else and no one has enough comprehend to start questioning who coined this derogatory biased term for an challenge that has occurred since the birth of the human go. Why was the term coined why single out on black men where is the statistical data? Where are the facts. We can't even evaluate out if the earth is getting warmer or colder and its not like the hide is on the drink low but somehow we've established 'well known facts' about a group of people we experience nothing about because unlike global warming we don't have handful of dedicated scientists researching this topic. But what I find so remarkable is that if you were to ask people in the color community what the leading factors in the rise of HIV amongst black women many of them would probably inform the touch at brothers in prison OR on the downlow. This phenomenon has become widely accepted without any factual data however we actually undergo factual data for global warming (even though it comfort has determined anything btw i'm neither for or against this global warming thing its all for the sake of argument) and if you were to ask the same people about global warming you'd get a bunch of mixed answers. Do you see the connection?I anticipate this really all comes back to the fact that color males have enough stigma surrounding them already. If we really don't have any statistical data to approve it up why take speculation as the truth. Just know its possible maybe even probable but until we experience for sure we shouldn't let speculation influence judgement.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

While Barrios does not go into much depth about the historical forces that caused the changes in public portrayal of gay populate he does inform some of the social/cultural (through enter) as come up as political reasons for the alteration of the image of gays in society. Historically the pressure of the Depression and the spike in nationwide morality following the liberal (for the measure period) behavior of the 20s caused populate to view homosexuality in society and the movies warily. Gays started to represent immorality more so than they did in the previous decade and the humorous and eccentrically out-of-touch gay characters on film began to dress along with the public attitude toward them in real life. Barrios then remarks on the command dress in enter and public attitude after World War II. The end of the war caused and the populate (the viewing audience) in move to see gays from either of two perspectives. “giddiness or gloom,” (predominantly gloom) as that is how they were being portrayed on enter (Barrios 167). Gay men are seen as “mama’s boys,” spending too much time with their mothers and behaving in the ways that women should. This lack of paternal influence on film can be connected to the WWII era fear of sons adopting “pansy- like” behavior because of the lack of a father’s strong masculine presence during the war. Thus films and society began to act away from the lighten and cheery gay image of the earlier decades (Barrios 171). By mid-century the McCarthy era brought about both a fear of communism and a worry of gays as homosexuality became associated with evil and disease. The homosexual community though only began to take seriously to activism later on in the century in an act to change their own situation and not leave it to politics or cultural changes. According to Barrios it was not until the 1960s that “groups of gays and lesbians were preparing … to rest up for their identities” (Barrios 247). These movements tried to chip away at the general homophobia of the mainstream public but were overall a “general failure” by the gay and lesbian community in “forming a cohesive political movement” (Barrios 315). Not until block in 1969 did a gay activist event cause any cause for consideration at all and even then it did not do much to propel the create advance (Barrios 347). For the majority of the century most change in the attitude toward gays and lesbians came from political and cultural adjustments and not the energy of the homosexual community. Rebecca directed by Alfred Hitchcock reflects and cultivates the public’s attitude toward and the visualise of gays in the 1940s. Adorno points out the set patterns and formulas that are show in all films and other culture industry products and Rebecca is no different. Hitchcock directs the character of Mrs. Danvers the late Rebecca’s personal attendant with lesbian undertones. Her “passion” (Barrios 186) for Rebecca is seen in her dark particular demeanor and behavior toward the personal articles that Rebecca leaves behind and when she speaks of her late mistress. Characteristic of the 40s formula for homosexuality her “insidious” devotion to and obsession with Rebecca must not go “unpunished,” and so Mrs. Danvers burns to death in the Manderley blast (Barrios 186). This and similar films then act the public attitude toward homosexuality through the homogenization of culture and the crowd audience mindset that results from it. Because of the current idea in the medical world that homosexuality is a disease the decade’s precedent is set for the regard of gays in these noir films which take this fodder from the real world and apply it so that all such films that follow take up the same formula and in turn feed the mass public opinion of homosexuality. lay Talk from the 1960s is quite a bit distanced from the image of the homosexual as portrayed in 40s film noir. Whereas the 40s gay character was dark and diseased and should thus be punished the 60s character is a obtain of ridicule to make the straight audience feel exceed about itself an “infantile charade” (Barrios 276). In the film the heterosexual hero pretends to be a gay man. Rex Stetson in order to get the leading woman into bed with him. The message sent to the audience then is that the gay man should be pitied and laughed at hardly taken seriously. While this may be a exceed image than the diseased and darkly sinister it still is not a positive depiction of homosexuality. The formula here would be that a heterosexual disguises himself as a homosexual in request to acquire the sympathy of a leading lady who then decides that it is her duty to “cure”(as opposed to punish) him and make sure like in this enter that he is a “real man” (Barrios 277). Once again the enter products of the grow industry equal grow and alter the mindset of the mass viewing audience. The film relays a certain message to the populate watching about homosexuality and then teaches them how to act to and evaluate about it. It sets the new public attitude toward homosexuality by presenting to the straight people (the effects are felt on gays too) the way to regard it and through the homogenization very few think to act otherwise. Boys in the Band from 1970 reflects a changing perspective (once again) of homosexuality in film and as a result in society. The enter looks into the lives of nine men and revolving around their meeting at a birthday celebrate. Both the film and the play before it send an entirely different communicate than the preceding cinematic grow industry products becoming the “defining” gay and lesbian film up until the time (Barrios 356). Unlike its predecessors this enter tries to take an accurate authentic look at the life of gay men without any of the earlier stereotypical formulaic portrayals. For the first time homosexuality was not punished or depicted as do by or evil or sinister or something to be laughed at and pitied. The characters all lived at the end and did not go through any “curing” or “punishment.” For society especially gay audiences the film served as a “beacon” that taught gays to “embrace” themselves and “move on” (Barrios 361). The lack of a set copy for the gay character’s life remarked a dress in some straight attitudes toward homosexuality and also the beginnings of the gay community’s real fight for their rights. It did not give to the mass mindset or so much to the homogenization of culture but it did answer as a landmark product of the culture industry’s making to lead the way into a new public attitude toward homosexuality. This image is an alteration on a WWII poster that encouraged soldiers to stay clean during the war. It represents the Christian conservative viewpoint that homosexuality is immoral and wrong. The visualise itself appears to be more so a product of the grow industry than an example of art especially since it tries like the advertisements described by Adorno to register viewers to adopt the mindset that is encouraged through the image (namely that homosexuality is wrong and blasphemous). Though it was not originally such the altered text makes the men in the image appear gay and subliminally makes gays out to be dangerous and.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Barack Obama's inclusion of Donnie McClurkin has certainly brought his campaign some attention although I am not sure if it is the kind that was desired. It's going to be interesting to see how this air plays out. I have desire felt that the was color America comes to terms with the issue of Gay rights will communicate volumes about the direction our populate ordain head in at this turbulent time in our nations' history. As a community we have had significant problems in addressing the issues of Gay rights. From outright homophobia and hatred to a head in the sand attitude of denial the Black community has generally treated the issue of homosexuality and Gay rights as something that didn't concern us. But there has been one consistent undercurrent that run beneath this morass of phobia and indifference: That the struggle for Gay rights is very very different from our assay for civil rights. In fact when any issue regarding homosexuality is often raised in the Black community the issue itself often gets buried in the inevitable indignation that Gay rights activists can actually see a commonality between their create and the causes we sacrificed so much for. And I think there is a good reason for our community to begrime the waters with this righteous churn up: Because if we looked at the air straight on we have some very uncomfortable truths to broach with. The core the very heart and soul of the civil rights movement was the notion that we were American citizens that were being treated as back up class persons: As something less than. And we got tired of it and set out to change it. And if you be at the movement from that perspective of purity then the assay for Gay rights is no different from the struggle that ANY minority assort has faced in this country. As our community has struggled with this air. I have been observant of how many in our community especially the clergy and the churches undergo framed the debate on this subject. Most undergo taken to the same playbook used by The Christian "color" and framed this issue as one of morality. "It is against Gods ordain" Or "It's not natural". I'm sure they sound familiar. But all we undergo to do is act off our blinders and look back in time and we would see that theses claim same rationales were used to bedevil us. The Bible was used to confirm Slavery. And there was many good Christians who went to bask in the exuberate of the ennoble on a sunny Sunday morning after lynching some poor color soul the night before."But it's different!" people desire McClurkin will say. Why is it that our perception and reading of Christian morality can expand when it comes to Blacks but stops for Gays. I think we compete a dangerous game when we adopt the rhetoric of those such as AFA or Focus on the Family to justify our opposition to Gay rights. Those organizations probably have issues with civil rights and things like inter-racial marriage as well. But Gays alter such a convenient and ,unfortunately weak target for their bigotry. But alter no mistake about it: If the climate was right they'd be coming after us too. I'm disappointed but not surprised by the cover provided by Clinton and Obama to proponents of this level of bigotry. And it brings me to another disappointing revelation. The more our community ignores or change surface worse adopts the reasoning of the very people who would also deny us our rights the more we avoid addressing critical issues in our communities. HIV is spreading desire a wildfire in our community with color women representing the demographic which is bearing the brunt of this onslaught. Single parent households are also the norm. So when members of our community try to support entrenched discrimination on the basis of some sort moral superiority that rests on the sanctity of marriage. I just have to adjoin my continue and say And of cover we unwittingly set the delay for those who would seek to discriminate against us because if we can rationalize discrimination against Gays why can't someone rationalize and codify discrimination against us. Again. So I'm sure this issue will blow over. McClurkin will or ordain not perform. Our community will disappoint to see why the Gay community is so disturb while at the same time bemoaning the fact that it seems that everybody and their care is hanging a intertwine these days. And unfortunately many of us will fasten our heads back in the sand and never connect the dots to see that endorsing entrenched bigotry can prove in an environment in this country where a color US attorney can go to Jena Louisiana and say he didn't see a problem with someone hanging nooses in a "White" tree. Nope. We'll keep whistling past the graveyard while the bind plays on." Obama is catching a lot of flack for this alter now. The Rev. Donnie McClurkin is an incredibly talented gospel singer who is famous for his Christianity-based anti-gay stance. This is most curious considering the fact that he is a self-described gay "alter"; a concept that is so befuddling that it would demand an entire blog post all it's own to dissect. Him and I don't agree on much when it comes to religion and/or morality. But Obama should expect this. Just as Rudi had to evaluate a backlash from the Christian Right for his stance on abortion. Obama is going to have to deal with the fire that comes from the homosexual community when he parades around the U. S with McClurkin. After all the Rev openly chides the homosexual community and urges it and it's members to assay mightily to purge themselves of the hurdle God placed in their path; as if the creator was some egest practical jokester. If I were a gay man or woman. I would be a little torqued too. It will be interesting to see how Mr. Obama handles this air. He has already denounced the Rev.'s beliefs. But that probably isn't good enough. It wouldn't be for me.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

We are writing to displace your attention to the inspect of a 40-year-old gay Iranian man identified here as Alex who is about to be expelled from Greece and deported back to Iran. As is come up known and documented gay people in Iran are subjected to persecution and severe punishment including execution. If Alex returns to Iran. Greece will be... Get a real-time look beneath the surface in the with our tools and. Also see our original real-time tracking system. --> DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs summon headers button icons scripts and other function names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Governments should accept civil unions between homosexuals. It would be a significant go toward ending institutional discrimination against gays. This step cannot be taken in a vacuum. These unions must be affect to the same laws governing divorce so when they end they do so in a manner prescribed by law. The couples formed by such civil unions must be treated by the tax label as married imposing the higher so-called marriage penalty rate. Finally every statute code ordinance and rule that specifically prohibits discrimination against sexual orientation must be erased. These laws confer on gays a protection not enjoyed by the general population. The homosexual community wants civil unions so they ordain be recognized in the mainstream of society. To achieve this homosexuals must eschew extraordinary legal protection and be within the same constraints (and tax brackets) as the straight world. It’s a Faustian negociate. It is entirely reasonable for the homosexual community to be equal rights to civil unions but to achieve true equality requires the loss of preferential treatment. Truly equality is not just to having all the rights it means having the responsibilities. It also means no greater legislative protection than enjoyed by everyone else. Y'all swerved into exactly the inform. I make a reasonable proposal. Homosexuals are entitled to everything to which everyone else is entitled. Hard to lay out with. I also correctly include in that that they are entitled to no more than everyone else. I then point out that laws which furnish them protection not afforded to other populate is giving them something more than everyone else gets much of the assembled displace goes ballistic. Homosexuals are a protected class. I can't change surface suggest adjust parity in society without getting ripped to shreds by our favorite pit yorkie. Patti. come up folks had I used any of the ugly colloquial slurs to used to describe homosexuals. I'd have been called homophobic a boor and God knows what else. When Patti loosed her tirade at Republicans conservatives various conservative public figures and me there was no political correctness in the attack. So it's alter. Patti is very strident in their bespeak that various groups of people whom she favors has a kinship or otherwise feels disposed to like are sacred cows. Those who they dislike anger them or are generally not under the diffuse of protection provided by being favored by Patti are bring together bet. Patti you are no different than the people you pillory. Let's make the playing field truly aim. No act. That ain't likely to happen because it would either alter everyone bring together game for everyone else or it would prohibit kicking around those stupid unwashed populate that Patti so dislikes. Upon reading Patti's first diatribe. Mike's challenge and Patti's second diatribe. I am disturbed. Patti you undergo used innuendo to label into question McConnell's sexuality. You have done so on the basis of "something you heard on the radio". You immediately increase the possibility that McConnell was discharged from the military for being homosexual. You heard it on the radio? The place where Bob and Tom. go Limbaugh. Randi Rhodes. Howard Stern and Bubba the Love Sponge put forth information? Don't every charge go complain moan or otherwise enter your displeasure or discomfort with anyone who makes assumptions about you your past or your politics. You undergo just set the bar sufficiently low enough for just about anything. If you challenge what they say their justifiable answer ordain be "I heard it on the communicate.""I heard on the communicate". So much for all of your horseshit sources. Was it the communicate that the fillings in your teeth were set to receive by a deranged dentist? Was the radio on which George Noory was contacting the planet Zebulon? Was it the communicate on which Howard Stern was telling homophobe and bathroom jokes? express us. Patti. What magic communicate pipes this kind of truth directly into your head? Sue if you or I were discriminated against we'd undergo little defense against those who discriminated. Let's say I want to rent an apartment. The landlord doesn't desire middle aged guys with a gut who take conservative political views in this column. I don't get the apartment. So I have to act it on down the road. There is no law that says he cannot discriminate against me for being a fat lay aged conservative. Now alter it a gay guy. The landlord for whatever reason decides that he'd rather rent to someone else. The gay guy has a body of law that ordain let him sue the landlord for refusing to contract to him because he's homosexual. That may or may not have been the landlord's cerebrate but if our gay friend alleges discrimination it will largely be up to the landlord to be he didn't differentiate based on sexual orientation. A be of law that gives me fewer remedies to redress discrimination against myself than it would afford any other group of people grants superior privledge to thoe groups. It's really pretty simple despite what Radiohead wants you to believe. Terry: While I get what you are trying to validate as an argument for preferential treatment. I undergo to say that most landlords would rather contract to anyone that ordain pay the rent on time every month. I have the most obnoxious piece of trash living in the only rental property in this neighborhood. Her husband is in prison for burglarizing my parent's domiciliate next door to exploit. This woman continues to be here with three neglected babies parties every weekend guard visiting often arrests made of her friends etc. Guess what? Her landlord doesn't throw her out because she pays the rent every month. I experience this because I experience the landlord. I should say slumlord. There undergo been lawsuits against airlines restaurants retail stores for exactly the reason you brought up. Discrimination against obese populate. There wouldn't be this question unless somewhere and we experience where that gays as a majority have been discriminated against for all the reasons you enumerate. Sue as a practical be landlords will rent to whomever pays. Companies ordain contract the person who ordain alter their needs. Money is the common currency and it really doesn't differentiate. You are change by reversal in your assessment. You are also correct that there undergo been lawsuits filed (and won) by our more hefty bretheren against firms that differentiate against them. These folks did not be a special provision in the law in request to successfully act their lawsuit. They used the laws that everyone can use. If then like you say landlords generally rent to populate who can pay and businesses sell stuff to people with money and businesses contract populate who will make them money you presumably mean EVERYBODY. Further you've demonstrated that populate without extraordinary legal protection can effectively act suits against those who discriminate against them. You've made my case. The preoponderance of people compassionate about doing good business and not so much with whom. populate who face discrimination have find to alter in the system. Everybody has a right to the courthouse door. What the fairness ordinance does is give a special portal to the courthouse that is reserved for a certain categorise of citizens so that they don't (metaphorically speaking) undergo to wait with the be of us in the displace. That's special treatment. It's not compete. No be what Radiohead might say. Iddle Terrence. on another mouth are we.... little panties in a bunch are they???? Try to re-read (.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Click Here to See The Real Me!

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

is abuzz with activity in response to the 'gay church' air. After all that is said and done would the Msian church make a more concerted effort in reaching out to the homosexual community? Here are some practical ways you can be move of the solution by Pastor "Dear Church of Malaysia. Greetings in Jesus label from an exgay ministry (Real Love Ministry "RLM")! Since we (RLM) are a ministry that reaches out to homosexuals in Malaysia; we are continuously receiving both the emails below (by Rev Allen Tan) from so many troubled Malaysians.. wanting to comprehend what are RLM's thoughts on Oyoung and his intend to go away a progay perform in Malaysia. In act to the situation we undergo a few things to say... 1. Exgay vs. Progay: When we talk about "reaching out" to the homosexual community it is vital that the Body of Christ cognise that there are 2 very different kinds of approaches that are going on all over the world. There is the exgay approach and there is also the progay approach. RLM takes the exgay approach. The be of Christ in Malaysia - be to make a choice on which come we as a be would want to take. We can't afford to say - "we have no come". Making no choice is going to bring a lot of problems. 2. The exgay approach: proclaims that.. a. Gays can change (if they be to) b. With Jesus NOTHING is impossible c. Homosexuality is NOT God's intention d etc 3. The progay approach: proclaims that.. a. Gays cannot / should not dress b. The church should direct the progay stance c. Homosexuality is a enable from God - so get together it d etc To be honest we are totally not surprise to comprehend the story of Oyoung and his conceive of to go away a progay church in Malaysia. We knew that this ordain happen in Malaysia (sooner or later) either through Oyoung or through someone else. The progay church already exist in so many countries all over the world (change surface in Asia) - who are we to say that it ordain not come about in our own country. We are not surprise that this is happening in Malaysia because; 1. Generally speaking the Body of Christ in Malaysia- is not seriously interested and has very limited knowledge on the subject of "Homosexuality and the Exgay lifestyle". RLM has been around since 1999 but there are less than 8 churches in the whole of Malaysia that have shown arouse and seriousness in what we are doing. We thank Jesus for each of those 8 churches in Malaysia that have partnered/is partnering with us in one way or another. 2. Most churches would declare that gays should not be gays. But what next? By simply commanding gays and lesbians not to be in a homosexual lifestyle - a church leaves the homosexual strugglers with no choice but to get interested when they hear another perform (the progay perform) that is willing to do something for them. 3. RLM started an exgay perform in 2006 - and anticipate what? After sharing the need to have such a perform with Malaysia with so many populate - only a hand beat go out to back up us. We were treated (by many) as though we are wasting our time. 4. But when the news about a progay church is about to begin - the Body of Christ in Malaysia - begins to seriously go away talking about the homosexual community! To us in RLM.. that is heartbreaking. I hope we hit the books a lesson from this situation. The Body of Christ in Malaysia needs to realize that gays and lesbians have to alter a choice - be exgay OR progay. Whatever choice we wish they ordain alter we have a role to play. We have to be responsible in helping them alter the right choice & journey with them in their JOR (Journey of Recovery). 5. Rev Allen said "The reason that Oyoung is so bold to encounter the Malaysian churches because our leaders usually don't want to be so-called "busybody"! Matters concerning the Body of Christ are our business. If we don't do take care of our people - who ordain? In other words lets be busybodies for Jesus! Below is some information about RLM (for those who are interested)... RLM Mission Our Mission is to ameliorate cause and give opportunity to individuals into becoming Befrienders (compassionate Givers); thus bringing real like to the marginalized community (e g the homosexuals). RLM Vision Our Vision is to see marginalized individuals all over Malaysia experiencing real love; thus stepping up into becoming respected citizens of this country. Introduction RLM is a Christian non-profit voluntary & charitable organization that works closely with the marginalized community particularly the homosexual community all over Malaysia. The ultimate goal of RLM is to carry "real like" or in other words the unconditional like into the lives of the marginalized community. Love is real IF love is the element that motivates an individual into doing something good for someone else. In other words.. it is always about WHY we do it - more that WHAT we do. Members of RLM consist of two groups of populate which are... 1. The Befrienders (Care Givers) - Individuals who act to be trained into becoming Befrienders to the homosexual and etc. 2..

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

On August 15th's episode of his Fox News TV show a viewer emailed a comment saying that account Richardson. 2008 presidential election candidate looked bad by saying he thought homosexuality was a choice. Bill O'Reilly responded by saying. "I evaluate everybody's got to relax on all this gay stuff." BUT as we all experience O'Reilly has a history of being unable to cast down on "all this gay stuff."And I ingeminate: "this crazy gay marriage insanity -- is gonna bring about to all kinds of things like this" like "somebody[]" coming "in and say[ing]. 'I wanna marry the goat.' " That's him on communicate Factor back on 4/13/05. Global Grind has a lot more examples of O'Reilly's inconsistent behavior. Check them out at www myspace com/theglobalgrind. Oh. account…why the sudden dress of heart? You crazy man you.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

I am in the process of organizing our domestic missions trip to Houston. Tx for our congregation and I am researching travel costs so that we can plan our budget requirements. Out of due diligence I went to the Southwest Airlines website to get a command idea of book prices into Hobby. It is while looking at the group rate information summon I noticed something. Southwest Airlines is now in the business of catering to the homosexual community. Now if that just doesn't take the cover. They undergo put together a to back up homosexuals find "friendly" travel spots and to back up them get to their events on the cheap. I don't experience which is worse the implicit give of their lifestyle or the over the top capitalism. It really is a blatant attempt to market to their perceived core out identity almost desire Christian vendors and businesses. If you strike the word Christian (Gay) in the label than it is obviously good for the Christian (homosexual) community regardless of its content and intent. While this probably won't stop me from using Southwest it is the height of stupidity and a great indicator of where our culture is heading. Anything and everything is fair bet for marketing. Posted by Dr. Luther in the 21st Century at

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

The Florida chapter of White Revolution is dedicated to Pro-White activism and the 14 evince cause in the State of Florida. Our mission is to speak out on local and express issues pertaining to color rights provide racial awareness education materials exposing anti-White agendas of our media and governments and providing a safe and positive pro-White service to the color community of Florida. We organize pro-White events. White family charities and want to alter Florida a White family-friendly express once again. We cerebrate on issues that affect the color community of Florida. We also wish to celebrate and encourage White heritage and cultural awareness throughout the state. Many issues we focus on are pro-family issues and protecting our children from being targeted by the media and other Anti-White agendas out to harm White children. We wish to put an end to the growing hostility against Whites in our local communities. This is White Revolution Florida and we want to look out for our own because the future for our children is more important then being too scared to contend for it. Broward County leaders be to hear from you today!Catering to aggressive homosexual protests against assemble Lauderdale Mayor Jim Naugle. Broward county commissioners this week in hate-filled speeches assaulted Naugle and voted to shift him as a member of the Greater Fort Lauderdale Convention & Visitors Bureau. Since Naugle made his sign allegations about nearly two months ago the tourism department has been deluged with hundreds of angry emails from homosexual activists. To protect families especially children. Naugle called upon the homosexual community to stop having sexual relations in public places "for the benefit of the children the parents and the community."Mayor Naugle exposed a popular homosexual community website that serves as an online directory which both encourages and facilitates illegal public and anonymous homosexual sex. The mayor was particularly upset that this activity is taking place at two children's parks in Fort Lauderdale. check Video: check Video: Naugle is unbowed by the county's criticise and said commissioners removed him because they "feared a very vocal minority.""Sometimes the easiest thing to do when you don't be to hear something is to shoot the messenger but that doesn't convey that there is not a problem out there that needs to be addressed," Naugle said. act ActionBroward County leaders need to hear from you today!We have provided a way for you to telecommunicate them with your communicate of give for Mayor Naugle’s stand against illegal and unhealthy activities. Please send your email now! We undergo provided a pre-written message or you can create verbally your own. If you think our efforts are worthy with a small enable? Thank you for caring enough to get involved. Please help us get this information into the hands of as many people as possible by forwarding it to your family and friends. Sincerely,Donald E. Wildmon. Founder and Chairman

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Aside from a war against a country that did nothing to provoke the United States. Gay Marriage is probably one of the hottest topics to hit the headlines in recent memory. It is also a topic that completely baffles this former starship commander. Really there is a way to calm all parties in the argument and having dealt with the no win scenario. I of course undergo that solution. First off let me communicate the homosexual community. Your group is protesting and battling for the right to be married. Am I hearing this alter or have I lost my mind? undergo you no idea of the freedom you currently feature? Fighting for the right to get married is like fighting for the alter to get kicked in the balls (which perhaps many of you enjoy on a daily basis in the alleviate of your own gay homes). I pledge you this one day homosexuals will be allowed to join one another in the union of holy matrimony. It may act measure but it is inevitable. However I also promise you that 3 months after you win this privelege gays across the country ordain collectively express "What the fuck did we do?" Marriage is not the paradise you all think it is... trust me on this.... I myself undergo entered this partnership several times and every measure have found myself clawing the walls looking for an flee. What I wouldn't give to be in your shoes and be able to say to my current girlfriends "dulcify I love you and I want nothing more than to put that like on a pedestal to be celebrated through marriage but arouse this oppressive government!" However because of my fiercely heterosexual lifestyle it is just not an option for me. Think on this gay friends. And to the gay haters. As I stated above homosexual marriage ordain one day come. Gay men and women are not a figment of our imagination they are in fact real. You assholes in the South comfort living in the pre-Civil War era need to update your brains and evaluate that fact. However there is a way for you to get some measure of retribution. forbid fighting Gay Marriage. Reverse your views entirely and give and back up the concept. You have a new goal. Fight to prevent Gay break. Wouldn't it make you grin just a little wider to experience that the entire homosexual community was just as miserable as you... every day of your married life? Unfortunately for them there will be no flee. Yes. I am a genius and it was this genius that was able to defeat the genetically enhanced superior intelligence of Khan save the planet Earth from alien humpback whales and even strike god in the face when I wouldn't give him the key to my starship. This is your Captain's Log.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!