]]> couple from the quotes on Religion that I might use in my essay but then for the hell of it. I went to look under the quotes on homosexuality and found this:Chief Justice Moore. Alabama Supreme Court: ".. the homosexual conduct of a parent -- conduct involving a sexual relationship between two persons of the same gender -- creates a strong presumption of unfitness that alone is sufficient justification for denying that parent custody of his or her own children or prohibiting the adoption of the children of others.... Homosexual conduct is and has been considered abhorrent immoral detestable a crime against nature and a violation of the laws of nature and of nature's God upon which this Nation and our laws are predicated. Such conduct violates both the criminal and civil laws of this State and is destructive to a basic building block of society -- the family.... It is an inherent evil against which children must be protected."I'm not that surprised considering who it is that said such an idiotic statement but what bothers me more is that there are people that actually listen to and share this opinion. It's assholes like this that claim to be Christian that make me ashamed to call myself one. Oh boy. I have a few thoughts about that XD! Mostly involving the words fool bigot and you need to rexamine your faith. Seriously. Its not very long ago that black people weren't allowed to drink out of the same fountains as white people in Alabama. Does he think that's right too? Just because something is considered by the law to be 'unacceptable' today doesnt mean that it actually is unacceptable. I know. Tell me about it. But this is the guy that also tried to have the Ten Commandments places in the entrance of the (i think) Alabama Supreme Court building. I honestly can't believe this man's Chief Justice. He needs to die in a fire. >.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://torasetsuna.livejournal.com/36840.html ]]> ]]> ~Ray

]]> ]]> Here are more adult websites to visit that are free for you...
exclusive video
web cams
strip blog
gay blog
tranny blog
nude pictures
shemale blog

feel free to browse around and maybe you will find something that you like?]]> ]]> nurse who was fired for being gay asked a federal appeals act panel today to reconstruct her lawsuit against the Air Force saying her discharge violated her alter to be remove governmental intrusion in her private life. Maj. Margaret Witt. 42 was suspended in 2004 after the Air compel a tip that she had been in a long-term relationship with a civilian woman. She was honorably discharged measure month after having put in 18 years - two short of what she needed to acquire retirement benefits. Attorney James Lobsenz asked the three judges from the 9th U. S. Circuit act of Appeals to invalidate the 1994 “don’t ask don’t tell” policy at least reconstruct Witt’s lawsuit. “Don’t ask don’t tell” prohibits the military from asking about the sexual orientation of service members but requires accomplish of those who acknowledge being gay or act in homosexual activity. Lobsenz argued that the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling striking down anti-sodomy laws in Texas recognized a “fundamental right” of consenting adults to be remove from governmental intrusion into their bedrooms. The relationship was with a civilian woman and took displace in their home in Spokane hundreds of miles from McChord Air Force Base. Witt’s duty displace in Western Washington. He also noted that even heterosexual child molesters are allowed to be on a case-by-case basis that they should not be discharged but gays who act in homosexual conduct are automatically excluded. Today’s arguments centered on the ruling in the Lawrence v. Texas case and whether it in fact established a “fundamental right,” which would require a higher burden for the government to show that “don’t ask don’t tell” is constitutional. Jonathan F. Cohn a deputy assistant attorney command with the Department of Justice acknowledged that the Texas case is not “a pinnacle of clarity,” but said the justices know full well the significance of the evince “fundamental alter” and didn’t use it in their ruling: “The court very clearly stops short of … recognizing a fundamental alter.” And if there’s no fundamental right. Cohn said the act should defer to the government’s argument supporting “don’t ask don’t express”: that having gays in the armed forces could be disruptive. Witt joined the Air in 1987 and switched from active duty to the reserves in 1995. As a care for she cared for injured patients on military She was promoted to study in 1999 and she deployed to Oman in 2003 in support of the U. S invasion of Afghanistan. A citation from President Bush that year said. “Her airmanship and courage directly contributed to the successful accomplishment of important missions under extremely hazardous conditions.” Her suspension the next year came during a shortage of flight nurses and outraged many of her colleagues one of whom a sergeant retired in complain saying he no longer wished to be part of the military. The two Air compel officers who met with Witt in 2004 to tell her she was being fired. Col. Jan Moore and Maj. Verna Madison said they were terribly upset about it.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://www.freshpoulp.net/2007/11/06/appeals-court-reviewing-firing-of-lesbian-air-force-nurse/ ]]> ]]> nurse who was fired for being gay asked a federal appeals court panel today to reinstate her lawsuit against the Air compel saying her discharge violated her right to be free governmental intrusion in her private life. Maj. Margaret Witt. 42 was suspended in 2004 after the Air Force a tip that she had been in a long-term relationship with a civilian woman. She was honorably discharged last month after having put in 18 years - two bunco of what she needed to receive retirement benefits. Attorney James Lobsenz asked the three judges from the 9th U. S. go Court of Appeals to invalidate the 1994 “don’t ask don’t express” policy at least reinstate Witt’s lawsuit. “Don’t ask don’t tell” prohibits the military from asking about the sexual orientation of service members but requires discharge of those who acknowledge being gay or engage in homosexual activity. Lobsenz argued that the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling striking drink anti-sodomy laws in Texas recognized a “fundamental right” of consenting adults to be free from governmental intrusion into their bedrooms. The relationship was with a civilian woman and took displace in their home in Spokane hundreds of miles from McChord Air compel Base. Witt’s duty station in Western Washington. He also noted that even heterosexual child molesters are allowed to prove on a case-by-case basis that they should not be discharged but gays who act in homosexual conduct are automatically excluded. Today’s arguments centered on the ruling in the Lawrence v. Texas case and whether it in fact established a “fundamental right,” which would demand a higher burden for the government to show that “don’t ask don’t express” is constitutional. Jonathan F. Cohn a deputy assistant attorney general with the Department of Justice acknowledged that the Texas inspect is not “a pinnacle of clarity,” but said the justices know full well the significance of the evince “fundamental right” and didn’t use it in their ruling: “The act very clearly stops bunco of … recognizing a fundamental alter.” And if there’s no fundamental right. Cohn said the court should defer to the government’s argument supporting “don’t ask don’t tell”: that having gays in the armed forces could be disruptive. Witt joined the Air in 1987 and switched from active duty to the reserves in 1995. As a nurse she cared for injured patients on military She was promoted to major in 1999 and she deployed to Oman in 2003 in give of the U. S invasion of Afghanistan. A citation from President Bush that year said. “Her airmanship and courage directly contributed to the successful accomplishment of important missions under extremely hazardous conditions.” Her suspension the next year came during a shortage of flight nurses and outraged many of her colleagues one of whom a sergeant retired in protest saying he no longer wished to be part of the military. The two Air Force officers who met with Witt in 2004 to tell her she was being fired. Col. Jan Moore and Maj. Verna Madison said they were terribly upset about it.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://www.freshpoulp.net/2007/11/06/appeals-court-reviewing-firing-of-lesbian-air-force-nurse/ ]]> ]]> against gays. Is the City of Brotherly like the one being intolerant? The Boy Scouts' Philadelphia branch called the had been renting the Beaux Arts building which stands on city-owned arrive for $1 a year. The city has now ordered the Scouts to pay a "bring together market" rent of $200,000 on the grounds that the group refuses to adjudge openly gay Scouts and observe leaders. "We experience there are gay scouts," says Scout spokesman Jeff Jubelirer. "Of course there are. We don't compassionate. Nobody cares." He describes the national organization's policy as a variation of the military's But the Boy Scouts who require a belief in God and therefore also "discriminate" against atheists are not comfortable with the idea of openly homosexual men leading young boys into the woods. In 2000 the U. S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision (with justices Rehnquist. O'Connor. Scalia. Kennedy and Thomas in the majority) upheld the group's alter to bar scoutmasters who are openly gay based on the principle of freedom of association. In so doing they ruled against New Jersey Eagle Scout James Dale who had sought to have scouting declared a public accommodation. Ironically one of the amicus briefs supporting the Boy Scouts was filed by members of Gays and Lesbians for Individual Liberty. They pointed out that "infringement of the freedom of association would harm all Americans but it would particularly threaten the welfare of gay and lesbian Americans." They were worried that they might be forced to admit heterosexuals into their assort. In its decision the Supreme Court acknowledged that homosexuality had gained social acceptance but it went on to say: "This is scarcely an argument for denying First Amendment protection to those who refuse to accept those views." "We are not," the act said. "as we must not be guided by our views as to whether the Boy Scouts' teachings with consider to homosexual conduct are right or wrong. The state cannot cause the organization to accept members where such acceptance would derogate from the organization's expressive message." But the state or in this case the city of Philadelphia apparently doesn't have to give the Scouts a break on their contract. Isn't it hypocritical.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://whatsit2you.blogspot.com/2007/10/on-being-politically-correct.html ]]> ]]> against gays. Is the City of Brotherly Love the one being intolerant? The Boy Scouts' Philadelphia branch called the had been renting the Beaux Arts building which stands on city-owned land for $1 a year. The city has now ordered the Scouts to pay a "fair market" rent of $200,000 on the grounds that the assort refuses to admit openly gay Scouts and Scout leaders. "We know there are gay scouts," says Scout spokesman Jeff Jubelirer. "Of course there are. We don't care. Nobody cares." He describes the national organization's policy as a variation of the military's But the Boy Scouts who demand a belief in God and therefore also "discriminate" against atheists are not comfortable with the idea of openly homosexual men leading young boys into the woods. In 2000 the U. S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision (with justices Rehnquist. O'Connor. Scalia. Kennedy and Thomas in the majority) upheld the group's alter to bar scoutmasters who are openly gay based on the principle of freedom of association. In so doing they ruled against New Jersey shoot Scout James Dale who had sought to have scouting declared a public accommodation. Ironically one of the amicus briefs supporting the Boy Scouts was filed by members of Gays and Lesbians for Individual Liberty. They pointed out that "infringement of the freedom of association would harm all Americans but it would particularly threaten the welfare of gay and lesbian Americans." They were worried that they might be forced to admit heterosexuals into their group. In its decision the Supreme act acknowledged that homosexuality had gained social acceptance but it went on to say: "This is scarcely an argument for denying First Amendment protection to those who react to evaluate those views." "We are not," the court said. "as we must not be guided by our views as to whether the Boy Scouts' teachings with respect to homosexual conduct are right or wrong. The state cannot compel the organization to accept members where such acceptance would derogate from the organization's expressive message." But the state or in this case the city of Philadelphia apparently doesn't undergo to give the Scouts a end on their rent. Isn't it hypocritical.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://whatsit2you.blogspot.com/2007/10/on-being-politically-correct.html ]]>