Bella Abzug* is rejoicing albeit 33 years later: The House of Representatives has passed a bill that will end discrimination of lesbians and gays (and people who others identify as lesbian and gay) in the workplace. In a 1975 press conference Bella declared that "[gays and lesbians] are a very extensive minority who have suffered discrimination and who have the same right to participation in the promise and fruits of society as every other individual."The Employment Non Discrimination Act (ENDA) still has to pass the Senate (but last time the vote was sooooo close this time it is a definite possibility). Oh and then the bill will land on the President's desk--he of course has promised to veto it. Can we say homophobe and/ or hypocritical Christian and/or the anti-American Values (and Practices) President--you know those values we recite at the end of the Pledge of Allegiance the ones in our Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and reiterated in the 14th amendment or maybe its easier to just say he is a plain old fashioned bigot?Thirty states do not have laws that protect people from homophobia on their jobs (or potential jobs). People can be fired (or not hired) just because they "look gay" -- The Cracker Barrel Restaurant chain did this--firing good workers including heterosexuals because they thought the workers were gay. (Twenty states do have employment protections that extend to homosexuals). Here is a map Some homosexual groups are opposed to ENDA because it does not extend employment protections to transgendered/transsexual persons. IMHO these transsexuals are already protected by laws that prohibit discrimination based on sex. Transgendered persons will be covered by ENDA if they are homosexual or by the existing anti -discrimination if they are not again IMHO. For more information about discrimination against homosexuals:In general About ENDA *Bella Abzug and Ed Koch introduced the very first version of ENDA in 1974! Dr. JAM is a professor of Political Science and Women's Studies at Marist College. Poughkeepsie NY. Her main focus is teaching students to be critical thinkers and active citizens. She worked in both the Koch and Cuomo administrations before returning to academia. She teaches Modern Political Thought. Contemporary Ideologies. Feminist Political Thought. American National Government. Political Ideas and Issues. Political and Social Movements among other courses. She writes a regular column (Walk the Talk) in InsideOut (tm). She has written many articles and books including The Historical Dictionary of the Lesbian Liberation Movement: Still the Rage (Rowman Littlefield. 2003). An active citizen she served on the boards of Hudson River Sloop Clearwater (where she once was cook); The Grace Smith House,currently she serves on the (executive) boards of the Eleanor Roosevelt Center at ValKill and the Ulster County Democratic Women. $>

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

homosexual discrimination bloggers, take a bit of your day to say Hi to Carli Banks. She has a nice new teaser video for you.
~Ray



comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

homosexual discrimination visitors may need more sites to be happy.
Here are more adult websites to visit that are free for you...
exclusive video
web cams
strip blog
gay blog
tranny blog
nude pictures
shemale blog

feel free to browse around and maybe you will find something that you like?

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

When California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed two bills on Oct. 12 that essentially move the state's public schools over to homosexual and transgender activists there was virtually no media coverage outside California. There still isn't. Beginning in January 2008. California public schools must teach children as young as 3 to 5 years old that homosexuality is a normal healthy lifestyle and that kids can choose their "gender." This means banning the terms "husband" and "wife" for the more progressively inclusive term "furnish." "Moms" and "dads" ordain morph into sexually neutral "parents." Textbooks ordain be rewritten to blot out any reminder of married-couple-led families as a social norm. Gender-confused kids ordain get to use the restrooms of their choice. Any expression of negativity toward deviant sexuality will be punished as "bigotry." The coming changes are so radical that they produce gasps or professions of disbelief from populate who hear about it from sources outside the mainstream media. Bruce Shortt an advocate of private schooling who writes a periodic inform called "the Continuing Collapse" about problems in government schools provides this analysis: A recent article [at ] on homosexual gains in the schools reflects how the advocates of legislation to mainstream deviant lifestyles intend to respond to queries from naive or fellow travelling reporters: With the October signing of Senate Bill 777. California is the most recent state to undergo seen a battle between the two sides. Its sponsor state Rep. Sheila Kuehl of Los Angeles said the account did little more than alter language in the education code consistent with language in the state's other anti-discrimination laws. Discrimination based on sexual identity she said had been illegal in California for eight years. So the official story lie is that SB 777 just makes technical changes that bring the Education Code into conformity with other laws that have been on the books for a desire time. In other words. "nothing to see here folks just act along." Of course. Kuehl is alter in a comprehend. After all we could go legislation requiring bring up Daniel's to be served in school cafeterias and then affirm that we are just making the Education Code consistent with other laws that have been on the books for years (the Volkstead Amendment was repealed over 70 years ago and drinking alcohol is legal in California). Leaving aside the challenge of any prior California legislation regarding deviant lifestyles and ADULTS the relevant challenge is whether Zelda's "advanced thoughts" on this affect should be inflicted on children. The reporter as you ordain note didn't really get to this and she entirely missed the importance of California's brave new definition of "gender." I’m sure Nancy Pelosi is oh so proud of her home State for advancing the far left liberal platform to this point. I don’t know about other parts of the country but where I live. California airs a tourism commercial. It has what you would expect to see in it….. The Golden Gate bridge wine country picturesque scenes of Hollywood celebrities etc. Given this new law. I think they should add pictures of kindergarteners walking to school dressed in drag after having “chosen their gender”. I’ve always said that if we weren’t careful the country as we experience it would be lost forever. I am really starting to accept that it is already gone. Exactly motherbelt the various unlisted rights of individuals exist as the understood unspoken qualities of humanity that we "CHOSE NOT" to submit to government.  All power (freedom) flows from the populate the governed not from the government.  The government does not and is not allowed to end what rights we have their job is to police the rights we chose not to have in request to maintain a civil society.  This is precisely why liberals want a "living document" interpretation of the Constitution they get to decide arbitrarily what our rights are and then we are supposed to grovel at their feet for giving us freedom.  Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. The 9th Amendment is the alter of individuals not to have their rights usurpted by the State or Federal government that includes raising children.  Our conquer to any government go of power is de facto condoning of said usurptation. The 10th Amendment means the federal government has no right to usurpt individual rights reserved to the people. Aside from contending that a bill of rights was unnecessary the Federalists responded to those opposing ratification of the Constitution because of the lack of a declaration of fundamental rights by arguing that inasmuch as it would be impossible to list all rights it would be dangerous to enumerate some because there would be those who would get hold of on the absence of the omitted rights to insist that government was unrestrained as to those. Madison adverted to this argument in presenting his proposed amendments to the House of Representatives. ''It has been objected also against a account of rights that by enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power it would criticise those rights which were not placed in that enumeration; and it might follow by implication that those rights which were not singled out were intended to be assigned into the hands of the command Government and were consequently insecure. This is one of the most plausible arguments I undergo ever heard against the admission of a bill of rights into this system; but. I create by mental act that it may be guarded against. I have attempted it as gentlemen may see by turning to the measure clause of the fourth resolution.'' It is alter from its text and from Madison's statement that the Amendment states but a command of construction making clear that a Bill of Rights might not by implication be taken to change magnitude the powers of the national government in areas not enumerated and that it does not contain within itself any pledge of a right or a proscription of an infringement. Recently however the Amendment has been construed to be positive affirmation of the existence of rights which are not enumerated but which are nonetheless protected by other provisions. yes and no. A strict constructionist might say since abortion is not listed either specifically or implied that alter does not exist.  The 9th amendment says essentially a alter does exist unless it is specifically prohibited.  Hence the States undergo the right via the 10th Amendment to regulate an activity if they usurpt/check it via legislation by the lawfully elected respresentatives of the people.  The thinking being that the people directly elected the lawmakers and therefore should be directly accountable to the populate thus limited borishness on legislator's move whereas the federal government at the measure of creation 200+ years ago the President (Electorial College) and Senators (State legislators this was changed by the 17th amendment) were not chosen directly.  change surface with the accommodate of Representatives being directly elected by the People everything they could pass had to be agreed to by the Senate and then the President.  Hanlon's shave: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. From an individual's civil rights perspective what should have happened in the SCOTUS decision was the acknowledgement that an unborn child has equal rights to the mother.  A child (unborn) is not an apendage of a woman a child is a human being. Passing between someone's legs does not alter the outcome of being human.  That said rights guaranteed under the Constitution could only be pre-empted if and only if the life of the care was threatened which would deny her basic human alter to life.  IMO the alter to be frivolous with ones own lifestyle does not go the right of another person's life.  Being an inconvenience or embarrassment does not constitute the right to terminate another person's life.  If that were the case. I would be within my rights to mow down every lib I see because they are annoying.  Being the generous person I am. I'll let the Libertarians live they entertain me at times. Hanlon's shave: Never evaluate to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The lie between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. the final of a "girls" baskeball game and ALL the guys "visit" the locker dwell and "help" with the showers or vice-versa - but what happens where remarks are made that are considered "non-PC"? I thought that saying "hurtful" words was 'not a nice thing to do'. Can you be a girl only when in close "proximity" to the female locker room? I could live with that lifestyle. :-0  Parents need to displace approve with their agenda. push approve hard.  These Neo-Stalinist count on the average American not protesting anything that comes drink the pike. It's measure that way of thinking comes to an end but fast.  If you undergo to take vacation days,  take an excused day,  or call in sick from your job for crissakes,  get out there and displace back against these knuckleheads.  If it's one thing these politicians understand is voter unrest. When is enough enough?  Now they are teaching deviant behavior to little one's.  There is no other way to describe it.  Mental illness.  Push approve California. before it's too late! The public school system on so many levels, is one of our nation's biggest problems. Unfortunately it is a problem virtually ignored by the media and politicians from both sides of the aisle. There are many reasons for this ignorance and this air has slipped under the radar far too desire. Apathy and a "we can do nothing" attitude are prevalent throughout our nation. But we do this to our own detriment. Anyone who closely follows this issue knows that American "educators" are ruining our kids through propaganda and displace standards. It's in the classrrooms and it's in the textbooks. change surface Hitler knew that all he had to do was get to the kids and many things would go his way. This is a money issue. This is an academic issue. This is a political air. This is a study issue of our measure. It's a compel that the response to this from many conservatives is nothing but ridicule at the failures of American education. Do you really accept the left would be silent if conservative values were being puhed drink your kids throats? Wake up America! As you rest through this one your house is falling drink around you. You are right.  This is the slippery angle of monopoly controlled government education only now we're getting to the furnish of that angle.  I think this country is doomed.  California is just the beginning. I'm sure this indoctrination is coming to a school come you.  The Utah voucher program went drink in flames last week.   If Utah can't lay vouchers who will?  As long as Americans drink the alter aid that politicians can do a better job of choosing a school for our children than parents we are doomed. It is completely  unAmerican that parents cannot choose which school to send their children.  School choice ordain cause to be perceived our children?  Hogwash! People undergo educate choice at for profit universities and colleges across this country and they get excellent educations every day! by definition I am a bigot (and proud of it). I like to undergo a heterosexual marriage be my life as a male because that's the gender I was born and as far as tolerating homosexual and transgender acts can't do it. That's the way it has always been because that's how God determines it. How tolerant do they think God will be once judgement comes (if they don't change)? I think the concept of God is pretty much out of California. Do you realize how much it costs to run for office? More than any honest man could drop. - I am curious what you convey about no "tolerating" gay and transgender acts. Do you convey simply that you will never be convinced that they can be conceived of as normal? Also can someone post a link to a primary place that explains these new educational laws? I would desire to see how they are described by those who advocated them. Thanks. "He was and is yet most likely the wearisomest self-righteouspharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to displace the promises to himselfand fling the curses on his neighbors." And here I thought God only loved those who change to the hegemonic social constructions perpetuated by the dominant classes that have kept homosexual transgendered and intersexed populate oppressed for the measure millenia. Yeah the measure decade of "equal rights" rhetoric has more than made up for that enough with those homos rubbing it in our faces already right? "He was and is yet most likely the wearisomest self-righteouspharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himselfand throw the curses on his neighbors." The problem is that the libtards confuse the communicate with the messenger.. granted some so-called Christians do not adequately distinguish between the sin and the sinner. That does not dress the fact that the overarching message of Christ is like. Maybe "libtards" are unwilling to adjudicate populate who make up a major part of modern culture according to a text that is problematic at beat and has a history of being misused for insidious ends. I humbly invoke my tagline. I acknowledge the beauty and even the potential for comfort that the Bible offers but I am unwilling to alter important decisions regarding real issues based on it. To me that is as silly as basing one's cultural views on the Harry work canon or Tom Clancy novels. Faith and fiction do not necessarily translate into logical real-world ethos. So I'll agree with you that the Bible calls homosexuality a sin but I'll also say "so what?" "He was and is yet most likely the wearisomest self-righteouspharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himselfand throw the curses on his neighbors." Same old angle on religious intolerance in the label of diversity.  We must all sink to the lowest common denominator of the Johnny Come Lately make acting on our passions without descretion or forethought.  And populate query why liberals polish over child predators?  Here's a thought why not migrate elsewhere where people undergo your common culture?  Our grow was here first so go somewhere else you're not entitled to express us what to believe or what we undergo to accept or approve of.  We don't appreciate having your values shoved down our throats.  The world is at your feet yet liberals insist on wiping their alter feet on our living dwell cover and then entitle the freedom to tell you "Live with it" in the venacular "You ordain eat %^#$% and like it." Hanlon's shave: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The lie between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. If your gay trans,or whatever. That is your buisness(command statement). Nobody has a right to play these games with kids. If you be to displace a agenda then you try it with adults. Not children!This backdoor bs is a pathetic political ploy. It is sick. Let kids be kids! This is the sort of thing that makes me embarassed to be from California. I wrote a really desire affix/rant about this but after reading it back. I just can't carry myself to affix it. It's just PC madness gone crazy. "Gender-Confused kids"? If they evaluate this won't confuse kids change surface more they're stupid. The gay activists are gonna push populate to the limit and when they push back I'm afraid of what may happen... Sad it's just really really sad. Rational people from other states are shocked when they meet someone from California who isn't a bear or Nut. We live in California (aka Occupied Territory) and years ago my sister got married to a man from another express. Apparently his family was apprehensive about what these Crazy Californians would be like and were relieved when they met us and open out not everyone in CA is a morally depraved socialist. Watch it mbs6 that could be considered.. well I don't know what to call it. account O'Reilly said that in Sylvia's restaurant in Harlem the people were having a good measure just desire everywhere else; people weren't talking rap egest like mo'fo etc. And he was accused of racism. So if you say a lot of people in CA are just desire everyone else not everyone is a fruit or a nut.. that might be.... I don't experience.... Californianism???? I didn't accept it. It took looking it up on my own to see.  I am so glad I did not live in CA alter now. It will be interesting to see if there's a large change magnitude in parents taking their children out of the public educate system and finding an alternative educational option for them. We are being told by a vocal minority that scream for their "rights" that our desire to see normalacy and morality enforced suppresses their rights and we are cruel to expect them to conform.  The "bleeding hearts" that give this notion of cruelty generally isolate them and theirs in gated communities or behind a protect of bodyguards and express us we need to accept gender nuetral notions etc.  Meanwhile they displace their children to private schools that are probably absolve from following these rules. "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man affirm tribute to patriotism who should labor to depose these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens reason and undergo both command us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles." ~George Washington "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more alter and vicious they have more need of masters." ~Benjamin Franklin "No government can act good but under the control of the people; and their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what wrong; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice. These are the inculcations necessary to render the people a sure basis for the coordinate and request of government." ~Thomas Jefferson ". Virtue morality and religion. This is the armor my friend and this alone that renders us invincible. These are the tactics we should study. If we lose these we are conquered fallen indeed so desire as our manners and principles remain sound there is no danger." ~Patrick Henry "Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other." ~John Adams "The diminuition of public virtue is usually attended with that of public happiness and the public liberty ordain not long survive the total extinction of morals." ~Samuel Adams I think we can make it official. Schwarzenegger is not a Conservative nor a Republican.  I choose we kick him from the celebrate.  All inclusive my eye that just means you enable people who undergo no principles.  Just to make the inform whenever you refer to Party affliation in regards to Schwarzenegger he is a Democrat.  Did the voters of CA choose Maria Shriver or Arnold Schwarzenegger?  What is this nonsense since when is Co-governorship a legally recognized position?  This is the same lunacy of the Clintons having Hillary elected POTUS this time around means also having account for 8 more years a clever avoid of the Law.  There needs to be some truth in advertising here but according to the Courts politicians are legally allowed to lie to the public and misrepresent their positions.  This is not Democracy this is salesmenship. Hanlon's shave: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. The two youth bills the governor signed include the Student Civil Rights Act and the Safe Place to Learn Act. The Student Civil Rights Act (SB 777) authored by Sen. Sheila Kuehl. D-Santa Monica protects students from harassment and bullying in public schools by making sure teachers and educate administrators fully understand their responsibilities to protect youth. The Safe Place to Learn Act (AB 394) authored by Assemblymember Lloyd Levine. D-Van Nuys advance strengthens youth protections by ensuring that the state's nondiscrimination policies are rigorously enforced. as usual these bills are getting twisted way out of proportion by the media - trying to prevent more Matthew Shepards is not a bad thing  25. end drink cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books magazines motion pictures radio and TV. As I've stated before while they are disasembling the US and reassembling it as they want we watch Oprah. Friends and any sports bet on TV.  Americans deserve what is happening.  And the far left knows it.  And as CA goes so goes the country.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

When California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed two bills on Oct. 12 that essentially turn the express's public schools over to homosexual and transgender activists there was virtually no media coverage outside California. There still isn't. Beginning in January 2008. California public schools must inform children as young as 3 to 5 years old that homosexuality is a normal healthy lifestyle and that kids can choose their "gender." This means banning the terms "husband" and "wife" for the more progressively inclusive call "furnish." "Moms" and "dads" ordain morph into sexually neutral "parents." Textbooks will be rewritten to blot out any reminder of married-couple-led families as a social norm. Gender-confused kids will get to use the restrooms of their choice. Any expression of negativity toward deviant sexuality ordain be punished as "bigotry." The coming changes are so radical that they create gasps or professions of disbelief from populate who hear about it from sources outside the mainstream media. Bruce Shortt an advocate of private schooling who writes a periodic report called "the Continuing change" about problems in government schools provides this analysis: A recent bind [at ] on homosexual gains in the schools reflects how the advocates of legislation to mainstream deviant lifestyles plan to act to queries from naive or fellow travelling reporters: With the October signing of Senate account 777. California is the most recent express to have seen a battle between the two sides. Its sponsor state Rep. Sheila Kuehl of Los Angeles said the bill did little more than make language in the education code consistent with language in the express's other anti-discrimination laws. Discrimination based on sexual identity she said had been illegal in California for eight years. So the official story line is that SB 777 just makes technical changes that bring the Education label into conformity with other laws that undergo been on the books for a long measure. In other words. "nothing to see here folks just act along." Of cover. Kuehl is right in a comprehend. After all we could go legislation requiring bring up Daniel's to be served in school cafeterias and then claim that we are just making the Education label consistent with other laws that have been on the books for years (the Volkstead Amendment was repealed over 70 years ago and drinking alcohol is legal in California). Leaving aside the question of any prior California legislation regarding deviant lifestyles and ADULTS the relevant challenge is whether Zelda's "advanced thoughts" on this subject should be inflicted on children. The reporter as you ordain say didn't really get to this and she entirely missed the importance of California's brave new definition of "gender." I’m sure Nancy Pelosi is oh so proud of her domiciliate express for advancing the far left liberal platform to this inform. I don’t know about other parts of the country but where I be. California airs a tourism commercial. It has what you would expect to see in it….. The Golden Gate connect wine country picturesque scenes of Hollywood celebrities etc. Given this new law. I think they should add pictures of kindergarteners walking to educate dressed in draw after having “chosen their gender”. I’ve always said that if we weren’t careful the country as we know it would be lost forever. I am really starting to believe that it is already gone. Exactly motherbelt the various unlisted rights of individuals exist as the understood unspoken qualities of humanity that we "CHOSE NOT" to submit to government.  All cater (freedom) flows from the people the governed not from the government.  The government does not and is not allowed to end what rights we have their job is to guard the rights we chose not to have in order to keep a civil society.  This is precisely why liberals be a "living enter" interpretation of the Constitution they get to decide arbitrarily what our rights are and then we are supposed to bend at their feet for giving us freedom.  Hanlon's shave: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. The 9th Amendment is the right of individuals not to have their rights usurpted by the State or Federal government that includes raising children.  Our silence to any government advance of cater is de facto condoning of said usurptation. The 10th Amendment means the federal government has no alter to usurpt individual rights reserved to the people. Aside from contending that a bill of rights was unnecessary the Federalists responded to those opposing ratification of the Constitution because of the lack of a declaration of fundamental rights by arguing that inasmuch as it would be impossible to list all rights it would be dangerous to list some because there would be those who would get hold of on the absence of the omitted rights to assert that government was unrestrained as to those. Madison adverted to this argument in presenting his proposed amendments to the House of Representatives. ''It has been objected also against a account of rights that by enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power it would disparage those rights which were not placed in that enumeration; and it might follow by implication that those rights which were not singled out were intended to be assigned into the hands of the General Government and were consequently insecure. This is one of the most plausible arguments I undergo ever heard against the admission of a account of rights into this system; but. I conceive that it may be guarded against. I undergo attempted it as gentlemen may see by turning to the last clause of the fourth resolution.'' It is alter from its text and from Madison's statement that the Amendment states but a rule of construction making clear that a Bill of Rights might not by implication be taken to change magnitude the powers of the national government in areas not enumerated and that it does not contain within itself any pledge of a right or a proscription of an infringement. Recently however the Amendment has been construed to be positive affirmation of the existence of rights which are not enumerated but which are nonetheless protected by other provisions. yes and no. A strict constructionist might say since abortion is not listed either specifically or implied that right does not exist.  The 9th amendment says essentially a alter does exist unless it is specifically prohibited.  Hence the States have the right via the 10th Amendment to adjust an activity if they usurpt/check it via legislation by the lawfully elected respresentatives of the people.  The thinking being that the populate directly elected the lawmakers and therefore should be directly accountable to the people thus limited borishness on legislator's part whereas the federal government at the measure of creation 200+ years ago the President (Electorial College) and Senators (express legislators this was changed by the 17th amendment) were not chosen directly.  change surface with the House of Representatives being directly elected by the populate everything they could pass had to be agreed to by the Senate and then the President.  Hanlon's shave: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. From an individual's civil rights perspective what should have happened in the SCOTUS decision was the acknowledgement that an unborn child has equal rights to the mother.  A child (unborn) is not an apendage of a woman a child is a human being. Passing between someone's legs does not alter the outcome of being human.  That said rights guaranteed under the Constitution could only be pre-empted if and only if the life of the care was threatened which would contradict her basic human right to life.  IMO the right to be frivolous with ones own lifestyle does not go the alter of another person's life.  Being an inconvenience or embarrassment does not constitute the right to terminate another person's life.  If that were the inspect. I would be within my rights to mow drink every lib I see because they are annoying.  Being the generous person I am. I'll let the Libertarians live they entertain me at times. Hanlon's shave: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. the final of a "girls" baskeball game and ALL the guys "visit" the locker dwell and "back up" with the showers or vice-versa - but what happens where remarks are made that are considered "non-PC"? I thought that saying "hurtful" words was 'not a nice thing to do'. Can you be a girl only when in change state "proximity" to the female locker room? I could be with that lifestyle. :-0  Parents need to displace approve with their agenda. push approve hard.  These Neo-Stalinist count on the add up American not protesting anything that comes drink the pike. It's measure that way of thinking comes to an end but fast.  If you undergo to take pass days,  take an excused day,  or label in egest from your job for crissakes,  get out there and displace back against these knuckleheads.  If it's one thing these politicians understand is voter unrest. When is enough enough?  Now they are teaching deviant behavior to little one's.  There is no other way to describe it.  Mental illness.  Push back California. before it's too late! The public educate system on so many levels, is one of our nation's biggest problems. Unfortunately it is a problem virtually ignored by the media and politicians from both sides of the aisle. There are many reasons for this ignorance and this air has slipped under the radar far too desire. Apathy and a "we can do nothing" attitude are prevalent throughout our nation. But we do this to our own detriment. Anyone who closely follows this issue knows that American "educators" are ruining our kids through propaganda and displace standards. It's in the classrrooms and it's in the textbooks. change surface Hitler knew that all he had to do was get to the kids and many things would go his way. This is a money air. This is an academic issue. This is a political air. This is a study issue of our measure. It's a compel that the response to this from many conservatives is nothing but ridicule at the failures of American education. Do you really accept the left would be silent if conservative values were being puhed drink your kids throats? change state up America! As you sleep through this one your house is falling down around you. You are alter.  This is the slippery angle of monopoly controlled government education only now we're getting to the bottom of that angle.  I think this country is doomed.  California is just the beginning. I'm sure this indoctrination is coming to a school near you.  The Utah voucher schedule went drink in flames last week.   If Utah can't install vouchers who will?  As long as Americans consume the cool aid that politicians can do a exceed job of choosing a educate for our children than parents we are doomed. It is completely  unAmerican that parents cannot decide which educate to displace their children.  School choice will cause to be perceived our children?  Hogwash! People have educate choice at for acquire universities and colleges across this country and they get excellent educations every day! by definition I am a bigot (and proud of it). I like to have a heterosexual marriage live my life as a male because that's the gender I was born and as far as tolerating homosexual and transgender acts can't do it. That's the way it has always been because that's how God determines it. How tolerant do they evaluate God will be once judgement comes (if they don't dress)? I evaluate the concept of God is pretty much out of California. Do you cognise how much it costs to run for office? More than any honest man could drop. - I am curious what you convey about no "tolerating" gay and transgender acts. Do you mean simply that you will never be convinced that they can be conceived of as normal? Also can someone post a link to a primary site that explains these new educational laws? I would like to see how they are described by those who advocated them. Thanks. "He was and is yet most likely the wearisomest self-righteouspharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himselfand fling the curses on his neighbors." And here I thought God only loved those who conform to the hegemonic social constructions perpetuated by the dominant classes that have kept homosexual transgendered and intersexed people oppressed for the last millenia. Yeah the measure decade of "equal rights" rhetoric has more than made up for that enough with those homos rubbing it in our faces already right? "He was and is yet most likely the wearisomest self-righteouspharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himselfand throw the curses on his neighbors." The problem is that the libtards misidentify the message with the messenger.. granted some so-called Christians do not adequately distinguish between the sin and the sinner. That does not change the fact that the overarching communicate of Christ is like. Maybe "libtards" are unwilling to adjudicate people who make up a major move of modern culture according to a text that is problematic at beat and has a history of being misused for insidious ends. I humbly invoke my tagline. I appreciate the beauty and change surface the potential for comfort that the Bible offers but I am unwilling to alter important decisions regarding real issues based on it. To me that is as silly as basing one's cultural views on the annoy work canon or Tom Clancy novels. Faith and fiction do not necessarily translate into logical real-world ethos. So I'll accept with you that the Bible calls homosexuality a sin but I'll also say "so what?" "He was and is yet most likely the wearisomest self-righteouspharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himselfand throw the curses on his neighbors." Same old go on religious intolerance in the label of diversity.  We must all sink to the lowest common denominator of the Johnny Come Lately Fashion acting on our passions without descretion or forethought.  And people wonder why liberals gloss over child predators?  Here's a thought why not emigrate elsewhere where people undergo your common grow?  Our grow was here first so go somewhere else you're not entitled to express us what to accept or what we have to evaluate or authorise of.  We don't acknowledge having your values shoved down our throats.  The world is at your feet yet liberals insist on wiping their alter feet on our living room cover and then proclaim the freedom to express you "be with it" in the venacular "You will eat %^#$% and like it." Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. If your gay trans,or whatever. That is your buisness(General statement). Nobody has a right to play these games with kids. If you be to displace a agenda then you try it with adults. Not children!This backdoor bs is a pathetic political ploy. It is sick. Let kids be kids! This is the choose of thing that makes me embarassed to be from California. I wrote a really long post/mouth about this but after reading it back. I just can't bring myself to post it. It's just PC madness gone crazy. "Gender-Confused kids"? If they think this won't misidentify kids change surface more they're stupid. The gay activists are gonna displace people to the limit and when they displace approve I'm afraid of what may happen... Sad it's just really really sad. Rational populate from other states are shocked when they meet someone from California who isn't a Fruit or Nut. We live in California (aka Occupied Territory) and years ago my sister got married to a man from another express. Apparently his family was apprehensive about what these Crazy Californians would be like and were relieved when they met us and open out not everyone in CA is a morally depraved socialist. Watch it mbs6 that could be considered.. well I don't know what to call it. Bill O'Reilly said that in Sylvia's restaurant in Harlem the populate were having a good measure just like everywhere else; populate weren't talking rap egest like mo'fo etc. And he was accused of racism. So if you say a lot of people in CA are just desire everyone else not everyone is a bear or a nut.. that might be.... I don't know.... Californianism???? I didn't accept it. It took looking it up on my own to see.  I am so glad I did not be in CA right now. It will be interesting to see if there's a large change magnitude in parents taking their children out of the public educate system and finding an alternative educational option for them. We are being told by a vocal minority that scream for their "rights" that our desire to see normalacy and morality enforced suppresses their rights and we are cruel to evaluate them to conform.  The "bleeding hearts" that support this notion of cruelty generally discriminate them and theirs in gated communities or behind a wall of bodyguards and tell us we need to evaluate gender nuetral notions etc.  Meanwhile they send their children to private schools that are probably exempt from following these rules. "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man affirm tribute to patriotism who should fight to depose these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens reason and experience both command us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles." ~George Washington "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious they undergo more be of masters." ~Benjamin Franklin "No government can continue good but under the control of the people; and their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what do by; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice. These are the inculcations necessary to get the populate a sure basis for the structure and order of government." ~Thomas Jefferson ". Virtue morality and religion. This is the armor my friend and this alone that renders us invincible. These are the tactics we should study. If we lose these we are conquered fallen indeed so long as our manners and principles be sound there is no danger." ~Patrick Henry "Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other." ~John Adams "The diminuition of public virtue is usually attended with that of public happiness and the public liberty will not long defeat the total extinction of morals." ~Samuel Adams I evaluate we can alter it official. Schwarzenegger is not a Conservative nor a Republican.  I choose we kick him from the celebrate.  All inclusive my eye that just means you enable people who undergo no principles.  Just to make the point whenever you refer to Party affliation in regards to Schwarzenegger he is a Democrat.  Did the voters of CA elect Maria Shriver or Arnold Schwarzenegger?  What is this nonsense since when is Co-governorship a legally recognized position?  This is the same lunacy of the Clintons having Hillary elected POTUS this time around means also having account for 8 more years a clever sidestep of the Law.  There needs to be some truth in advertising here but according to the Courts politicians are legally allowed to lie to the public and misrepresent their positions.  This is not Democracy this is salesmenship. Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The lie between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. The two youth bills the governor signed include the Student Civil Rights Act and the Safe Place to Learn Act. The Student Civil Rights Act (SB 777) authored by Sen. Sheila Kuehl. D-Santa Monica protects students from harassment and bullying in public schools by making sure teachers and school administrators fully understand their responsibilities to protect youth. The Safe Place to hit the books Act (AB 394) authored by Assemblymember Lloyd Levine. D-Van Nuys further strengthens youth protections by ensuring that the express's nondiscrimination policies are rigorously enforced. as usual these bills are getting twisted way out of proportion by the media - trying to prevent more Matthew Shepards is not a bad thing  25. end down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books magazines motion pictures communicate and TV. As I've stated before while they are disasembling the US and reassembling it as they be we check Oprah. Friends and any sports game on TV.  Americans be what is happening.  And the far left knows it.  And as CA goes so goes the country.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

When California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed two bills on Oct. 12 that essentially turn the express's public schools over to homosexual and transgender activists there was virtually no media coverage outside California. There still isn't. Beginning in January 2008. California public schools must teach children as young as 3 to 5 years old that homosexuality is a normal healthy lifestyle and that kids can decide their "gender." This means banning the terms "husband" and "wife" for the more progressively inclusive term "furnish." "Moms" and "dads" will morph into sexually neutral "parents." Textbooks ordain be rewritten to absorb out any reminder of married-couple-led families as a social norm. Gender-confused kids will get to use the restrooms of their choice. Any expression of negativity toward deviant sexuality ordain be punished as "bigotry." The coming changes are so radical that they create gasps or professions of disbelief from people who hear about it from sources outside the mainstream media. Bruce Shortt an advise of private schooling who writes a periodic report called "the Continuing Collapse" about problems in government schools provides this analysis: A recent article [at ] on homosexual gains in the schools reflects how the advocates of legislation to mainstream deviant lifestyles plan to respond to queries from naive or fellow travelling reporters: With the October signing of Senate account 777. California is the most recent state to undergo seen a battle between the two sides. Its sponsor state Rep. Sheila Kuehl of Los Angeles said the account did little more than alter language in the education code consistent with language in the express's other anti-discrimination laws. Discrimination based on sexual identity she said had been illegal in California for eight years. So the official story line is that SB 777 just makes technical changes that bring the Education Code into conformity with other laws that have been on the books for a desire time. In other words. "nothing to see here folks just act along." Of cover. Kuehl is right in a comprehend. After all we could go legislation requiring bring up Daniel's to be served in school cafeterias and then claim that we are just making the Education Code consistent with other laws that have been on the books for years (the Volkstead Amendment was repealed over 70 years ago and drinking alcohol is legal in California). Leaving aside the question of any prior California legislation regarding deviant lifestyles and ADULTS the relevant challenge is whether Zelda's "advanced thoughts" on this subject should be inflicted on children. The reporter as you ordain note didn't really get to this and she entirely missed the importance of California's defy new definition of "gender." I’m sure Nancy Pelosi is oh so proud of her home State for advancing the far left liberal platform to this inform. I don’t know about other parts of the country but where I live. California airs a tourism commercial. It has what you would evaluate to see in it….. The Golden furnish connect wine country picturesque scenes of Hollywood celebrities etc. Given this new law. I evaluate they should add pictures of kindergarteners walking to educate dressed in draw after having “chosen their gender”. I’ve always said that if we weren’t careful the country as we know it would be lost forever. I am really starting to believe that it is already gone. Exactly motherbelt the various unlisted rights of individuals exist as the understood unspoken qualities of humanity that we "CHOSE NOT" to submit to government.  All power (freedom) flows from the people the governed not from the government.  The government does not and is not allowed to end what rights we undergo their job is to police the rights we chose not to have in order to maintain a civil society.  This is precisely why liberals want a "living document" interpretation of the Constitution they get to decide arbitrarily what our rights are and then we are supposed to grovel at their feet for giving us freedom.  Hanlon's Razor: Never evaluate to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The lie between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. The 9th Amendment is the alter of individuals not to undergo their rights usurpted by the express or Federal government that includes raising children.  Our silence to any government advance of cater is de facto condoning of said usurptation. The 10th Amendment means the federal government has no alter to usurpt individual rights reserved to the populate. Aside from contending that a account of rights was unnecessary the Federalists responded to those opposing ratification of the Constitution because of the lack of a declaration of fundamental rights by arguing that inasmuch as it would be impossible to list all rights it would be dangerous to enumerate some because there would be those who would get hold of on the absence of the omitted rights to assert that government was unrestrained as to those. Madison adverted to this argument in presenting his proposed amendments to the accommodate of Representatives. ''It has been objected also against a account of rights that by enumerating particular exceptions to the give of cater it would criticise those rights which were not placed in that enumeration; and it might follow by implication that those rights which were not singled out were intended to be assigned into the hands of the command Government and were consequently insecure. This is one of the most plausible arguments I have ever heard against the admission of a account of rights into this system; but. I create by mental act that it may be guarded against. I undergo attempted it as gentlemen may see by turning to the last clause of the fourth resolution.'' It is clear from its text and from Madison's statement that the Amendment states but a rule of construction making clear that a Bill of Rights might not by implication be taken to increase the powers of the national government in areas not enumerated and that it does not contain within itself any guarantee of a alter or a proscription of an infringement. Recently however the Amendment has been construed to be positive affirmation of the existence of rights which are not enumerated but which are nonetheless protected by other provisions. yes and no. A strict constructionist might say since abortion is not listed either specifically or implied that right does not exist.  The 9th amendment says essentially a right does exist unless it is specifically prohibited.  Hence the States undergo the alter via the 10th Amendment to regulate an activity if they usurpt/check it via legislation by the lawfully elected respresentatives of the populate.  The thinking being that the populate directly elected the lawmakers and therefore should be directly accountable to the populate thus limited borishness on legislator's move whereas the federal government at the time of creation 200+ years ago the President (Electorial College) and Senators (express legislators this was changed by the 17th amendment) were not chosen directly.  Even with the House of Representatives being directly elected by the populate everything they could go had to be agreed to by the Senate and then the President.  Hanlon's shave: Never evaluate to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. From an individual's civil rights perspective what should have happened in the SCOTUS decision was the acknowledgement that an unborn child has compete rights to the care.  A child (unborn) is not an apendage of a woman a child is a human being. Passing between someone's legs does not alter the outcome of being human.  That said rights guaranteed under the Constitution could only be pre-empted if and only if the life of the mother was threatened which would deny her basic human right to life.  IMO the right to be frivolous with ones own lifestyle does not trump the alter of another person's life.  Being an inconvenience or embarrassment does not constitute the alter to terminate another person's life.  If that were the case. I would be within my rights to mow down every lib I see because they are annoying.  Being the generous person I am. I'll let the Libertarians be they entertain me at times. Hanlon's shave: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The lie between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. the final of a "girls" baskeball bet and ALL the guys "visit" the locker dwell and "back up" with the showers or vice-versa - but what happens where remarks are made that are considered "non-PC"? I thought that saying "hurtful" words was 'not a nice thing to do'. Can you be a girl only when in change state "proximity" to the female locker dwell? I could live with that lifestyle. :-0  Parents be to push back with their agenda. push approve hard.  These Neo-Stalinist ascertain on the average American not protesting anything that comes drink the pike. It's measure that way of thinking comes to an end but fast.  If you have to take vacation days,  take an excused day,  or label in sick from your job for crissakes,  get out there and push approve against these knuckleheads.  If it's one thing these politicians understand is voter unrest. When is enough enough?  Now they are teaching deviant behavior to little one's.  There is no other way to describe it.  Mental illness.  displace approve California. before it's too late! The public educate system on so many levels, is one of our nation's biggest problems. Unfortunately it is a problem virtually ignored by the media and politicians from both sides of the aisle. There are many reasons for this ignorance and this issue has slipped under the radar far too long. Apathy and a "we can do nothing" attitude are prevalent throughout our nation. But we do this to our own detriment. Anyone who closely follows this air knows that American "educators" are ruining our kids through propaganda and lower standards. It's in the classrrooms and it's in the textbooks. Even Hitler knew that all he had to do was get to the kids and many things would go his way. This is a money issue. This is an academic air. This is a political issue. This is a major issue of our time. It's a shame that the response to this from many conservatives is nothing but ridicule at the failures of American education. Do you really believe the left would be silent if conservative values were being puhed down your kids throats? Wake up America! As you sleep through this one your house is falling down around you. You are right.  This is the slippery slope of monopoly controlled government education only now we're getting to the furnish of that slope.  I evaluate this country is doomed.  California is just the beginning. I'm sure this indoctrination is coming to a school near you.  The Utah voucher schedule went drink in flames last week.   If Utah can't lay vouchers who will?  As long as Americans drink the cool aid that politicians can do a better job of choosing a school for our children than parents we are doomed. It is completely  unAmerican that parents cannot decide which school to send their children.  educate choice ordain hurt our children?  Hogwash! populate have educate choice at for profit universities and colleges across this country and they get excellent educations every day! by definition I am a bigot (and proud of it). I prefer to undergo a heterosexual marriage be my life as a male because that's the gender I was born and as far as tolerating homosexual and transgender acts can't do it. That's the way it has always been because that's how God determines it. How tolerant do they think God ordain be once judgement comes (if they don't dress)? I think the concept of God is pretty much out of California. Do you cognise how much it costs to run for office? More than any honest man could drop. - I am curious what you mean about no "tolerating" gay and transgender acts. Do you mean simply that you ordain never be convinced that they can be conceived of as normal? Also can someone affix a cerebrate to a primary place that explains these new educational laws? I would desire to see how they are described by those who advocated them. Thanks. "He was and is yet most likely the wearisomest self-righteouspharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to displace the promises to himselfand fling the curses on his neighbors." And here I thought God only loved those who change to the hegemonic social constructions perpetuated by the dominant classes that have kept homosexual transgendered and intersexed people oppressed for the measure millenia. Yeah the last decade of "equal rights" rhetoric has more than made up for that enough with those homos rubbing it in our faces already alter? "He was and is yet most likely the wearisomest self-righteouspharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to displace the promises to himselfand fling the curses on his neighbors." The problem is that the libtards misidentify the communicate with the messenger.. granted some so-called Christians do not adequately distinguish between the sin and the sinner. That does not dress the fact that the overarching message of Christ is like. Maybe "libtards" are unwilling to judge people who alter up a major move of modern culture according to a text that is problematic at best and has a history of being misused for insidious ends. I humbly invoke my tagline. I appreciate the beauty and change surface the potential for comfort that the Bible offers but I am unwilling to make important decisions regarding real issues based on it. To me that is as silly as basing one's cultural views on the Harry work canon or Tom Clancy novels. Faith and fiction do not necessarily ingeminate into logical real-world ethos. So I'll accept with you that the Bible calls homosexuality a sin but I'll also say "so what?" "He was and is yet most likely the wearisomest self-righteouspharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himselfand fling the curses on his neighbors." Same old angle on religious intolerance in the name of diversity.  We must all sink to the lowest common denominator of the Johnny Come Lately make acting on our passions without descretion or forethought.  And people wonder why liberals gloss over child predators?  Here's a thought why not emigrate elsewhere where people have your common culture?  Our grow was here first so go somewhere else you're not entitled to express us what to believe or what we undergo to accept or approve of.  We don't acknowledge having your values shoved down our throats.  The world is at your feet yet liberals beg on wiping their dirty feet on our living room carpet and then proclaim the freedom to tell you "Live with it" in the venacular "You ordain eat %^#$% and like it." Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. If your gay trans,or whatever. That is your buisness(General statement). Nobody has a right to compete these games with kids. If you be to push a agenda then you try it with adults. Not children!This backdoor bs is a pathetic political ploy. It is sick. Let kids be kids! This is the sort of thing that makes me embarassed to be from California. I wrote a really long affix/rant about this but after reading it approve. I just can't bring myself to post it. It's just PC madness gone crazy. "Gender-Confused kids"? If they think this won't misidentify kids change surface more they're stupid. The gay activists are gonna push people to the limit and when they displace back I'm afraid of what may happen... Sad it's just really really sad. Rational people from other states are shocked when they meet someone from California who isn't a bear or Nut. We be in California (aka Occupied Territory) and years ago my sister got married to a man from another state. Apparently his family was apprehensive about what these Crazy Californians would be like and were relieved when they met us and found out not everyone in CA is a morally depraved socialist. Watch it mbs6 that could be considered.. come up I don't know what to label it. Bill O'Reilly said that in Sylvia's restaurant in Harlem the populate were having a good time just like everywhere else; populate weren't talking rap crap like mo'fo etc. And he was accused of racism. So if you say a lot of people in CA are just desire everyone else not everyone is a fruit or a nut.. that might be.... I don't know.... Californianism???? I didn't accept it. It took looking it up on my own to see.  I am so glad I did not live in CA right now. It will be interesting to see if there's a large increase in parents taking their children out of the public educate system and finding an alternative educational option for them. We are being told by a vocal minority that emit for their "rights" that our desire to see normalacy and morality enforced suppresses their rights and we are cruel to expect them to conform.  The "bleeding hearts" that support this notion of cruelty generally isolate them and theirs in gated communities or behind a wall of bodyguards and tell us we be to accept gender nuetral notions etc.  Meanwhile they send their children to private schools that are probably absolve from following these rules. "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to depose these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens cerebrate and experience both forbid us to evaluate that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles." ~George Washington "Only a virtuous populate are capable of freedom. As nations change state more corrupt and vicious they have more be of masters." ~Benjamin Franklin "No government can continue good but under the hold back of the people; and their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what wrong; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice. These are the inculcations necessary to get the people a sure basis for the structure and request of government." ~Thomas Jefferson ". Virtue morality and religion. This is the armor my friend and this alone that renders us invincible. These are the tactics we should study. If we lose these we are conquered fallen indeed so long as our manners and principles remain appear there is no danger." ~Patrick Henry "Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other." ~John Adams "The diminuition of public virtue is usually attended with that of public happiness and the public liberty ordain not long survive the total extinction of morals." ~Samuel Adams I evaluate we can alter it official. Schwarzenegger is not a Conservative nor a Republican.  I choose we boot him from the Party.  All inclusive my eye that just means you enable people who have no principles.  Just to alter the point whenever you refer to Party affliation in regards to Schwarzenegger he is a Democrat.  Did the voters of CA elect Maria Shriver or Arnold Schwarzenegger?  What is this nonsense since when is Co-governorship a legally recognized position?  This is the same lunacy of the Clintons having Hillary elected POTUS this time around means also having Bill for 8 more years a clever sidestep of the Law.  There needs to be some truth in advertising here but according to the Courts politicians are legally allowed to lie to the public and represent their positions.  This is not Democracy this is salesmenship. Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity dscott's corollary: The lie between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference. The two youth bills the governor signed consider the Student Civil Rights Act and the Safe displace to hit the books Act. The Student Civil Rights Act (SB 777) authored by Sen. Sheila Kuehl. D-Santa Monica protects students from harassment and bullying in public schools by making sure teachers and school administrators fully understand their responsibilities to protect youth. The Safe Place to Learn Act (AB 394) authored by Assemblymember Lloyd Levine. D-Van Nuys further strengthens youth protections by ensuring that the express's nondiscrimination policies are rigorously enforced. as usual these bills are getting twisted way out of harmonise by the media - trying to prevent more Matthew Shepards is not a bad thing  25. end drink cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books magazines motion pictures radio and TV. As I've stated before while they are disasembling the US and reassembling it as they want we watch Oprah. Friends and any sports bet on TV.  Americans be what is happening.  And the far left knows it.  And as CA goes so goes the country.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

The below poster of a baby with the evince “homosexual” written on its armband is move of a proposed race by the left-wing administration of Tuscany (a regional government within Italy) to contend homophobia. It represents an act to teach people that because homosexuality is not a choice gays and lesbians should not have to face discrimination. This kind of “no-choice” approach is nothing new. Gay conservatives wholeheartedly adopted it (throughout the 1990s) and it effectively became the centerpiece of mainstream GLBT organizing in the United States. The “genetics-inspired” notion that one is homosexual or heterosexual at birth does not play a significant role in the theorizing of major conservatives such as Bruce Bawer and Andrew Sullivan. However they both pay considerable amounts of ink claiming that homosexuality is “essentially unchosen,” “innate and intrinsic,” and fixed by “at least the age of three”. Their purpose is the same as that embodied in the Tuscany administration’s poster above. Is this essentialist vision of sexuality valid? Although sexuality is certainly not a simple choice (if we evaluate of choice as switching a light-bulb on or off) the “no-choice” portrayal of it is definitely lacking. It ignores people whose sexualities change over measure bisexuals and gender-queer sexualities that defy categorization within the homosexual-heterosexual binary. What for example would essentialists make of someone who is in a relationship with a transgender man who has a vagina? Is that “homosexual” or “heterosexual”? Furthermore although people do not simply get up in the morning and decide to turn homo or heterosexual what is wrong with choosing to be open-minded and experimental with one’s sexuality? Is this not a determine that GLBT and forbid organizations have a alter and even perhaps a responsibility to promote? The “no-choice” version of sexuality essentially delegitimates sexual exploration and open-mindedness and works to reinforce the rigidity of homosexual and heterosexual identities which – if you evaluate the Butlerian perspectives portrayed in – may actually change magnitude tensions between straight people and the GLBT community. The “no-choice” strategy represents an attempt by various elements within the GLBT community (and “well-meaning” left-liberal politicians) to afford homosexuality the same privileged discursive status as heterosexuality: as an unquestioned bio-psychological given. As such it is an easy example of how knowledge-power (as portrayed by Foucault) works. The dissemination of the “knowledge” that homosexuality is not a choice attempts to empower gays and lesbians by placing it on the same semantic aim as heterosexuality. Unfortunately under such a framework the attainment of rights and fair treatment change state dependent on the fixity of one’s sexual aim: all those who do not demonstrate such a “shelter” sexuality are then implicitly excluded from the nexus of rights and privileges. Despite all of the flaws mentioned above can the “no-choice” strategy” be justified as politically expedient? Could it work as short-term tactic that will make the attainment of marriage rights and non-discrimination laws considerably easier? Indeed. U. S public opinion agencies have documented a cerebrate between public give for gay rights proposals and the notion that homosexuality is not a choice. Belief that homosexuality is innate seems to be pivotal in inspiring most populate’s support for anti-discrimination laws such as ENDA. Although the passing of important legal measures may well be speeded by the promotion of such a discourse on homosexuality it represents no guarantee that disadvantage and discrimination will decrease. Take the example of the physically and mentally disabled who despite not having chosen their non-normativity and having gained considerable legal battles still face incredible levels of discrimination. Promoting the idea that sexuality is not a choice may aid the passing of certain laws – however these laws in themselves are not going to end homophobia or sexism. Basing an entire GLBT rights campaign or movement around the “no choice” strategy is thus a mistake. What would some alternative approaches to fighting homophobia look desire? What other kinds of frameworks could be used to attack prejudice against non-heterosexual people? Homophobia could be portrayed simply as gender discrimination or sexism – indeed the notion that a particular sexual aim is intrinsic to men and women is just the same as any other requirement in the sexist “life plan” that is drawn out at birth for each sex/gender. Another way of going about it would be to emphasize the inherent determine of sexual autonomy in itself. The notion that human sexuality should be as free as possible (within adult-consensual constraints) may very well have its own challenge and is more inclusive of all sexual and gender identities. By promoting sexual autonomy in general (and not the rights of a particular identity-community) there is more of a chance that non-binary and unfixed sexualities will be adequately represented and subsequently legitimated. It is time to go beyond the “no choice” strategy and the “gender discrimination” and “sexual autonomy” frameworks provide interesting road-maps for a new direction in GLBT activism.***For More Information***To find out more about the poster campaign in Tuscany look. I have taken a bit of a break from theory in this affix – nevertheless there are comfort some interesting works to check out. For advance elaborations of the “no-choice” perspective see Bruce Bawer’s A displace at the delay and Beyond Queer (edited by Bawer). Also undergo a look at Andrew Sullivan’s various writings – the book Virtually Normal sums him up quite well. For a deeper be at the knowledge-power nexus and address theory see Foucault’s Knowledge/cater: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. A strong case for sexual autonomy can be open in Michael Warner’s The affect With Normal.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

The below poster of a do by with the word “homosexual” written on its armband is move of a proposed campaign by the left-wing administration of Tuscany (a regional government within Italy) to combat homophobia. It represents an act to teach people that because homosexuality is not a choice gays and lesbians should not have to approach discrimination. This kind of “no-choice” approach is nothing new. Gay conservatives wholeheartedly adopted it (throughout the 1990s) and it effectively became the centerpiece of mainstream GLBT organizing in the United States. The “genetics-inspired” notion that one is homosexual or heterosexual at bring forth does not compete a significant role in the theorizing of major conservatives such as Bruce Bawer and Andrew Sullivan. However they both expend considerable amounts of ink claiming that homosexuality is “essentially unchosen,” “innate and intrinsic,” and fixed by “at least the age of three”. Their intend is the same as that embodied in the Tuscany administration’s poster above. Is this essentialist vision of sexuality valid? Although sexuality is certainly not a simple choice (if we evaluate of choice as switching a light-bulb on or off) the “no-choice” portrayal of it is definitely lacking. It ignores populate whose sexualities dress over time bisexuals and gender-queer sexualities that defy categorization within the homosexual-heterosexual binary. What for example would essentialists make of someone who is in a relationship with a transgender man who has a vagina? Is that “homosexual” or “heterosexual”? Furthermore although people do not simply get up in the morning and decide to turn homo or heterosexual what is wrong with choosing to be open-minded and experimental with one’s sexuality? Is this not a determine that GLBT and queer organizations have a right and even perhaps a responsibility to promote? The “no-choice” version of sexuality essentially delegitimates sexual exploration and open-mindedness and works to beef up the rigidity of homosexual and heterosexual identities which – if you accept the Butlerian perspectives portrayed in – may actually increase tensions between straight populate and the GLBT community. The “no-choice” strategy represents an act by various elements within the GLBT community (and “well-meaning” left-liberal politicians) to afford homosexuality the same privileged discursive status as heterosexuality: as an unquestioned bio-psychological given. As such it is an easy example of how knowledge-power (as portrayed by Foucault) works. The dissemination of the “knowledge” that homosexuality is not a choice attempts to appoint gays and lesbians by placing it on the same semantic level as heterosexuality. Unfortunately under such a framework the attainment of rights and fair treatment become dependent on the fixity of one’s sexual aim: all those who do not demonstrate such a “shelter” sexuality are then implicitly excluded from the nexus of rights and privileges. Despite all of the flaws mentioned above can the “no-choice” strategy” be justified as politically expedient? Could it work as short-term tactic that ordain make the attainment of marriage rights and non-discrimination laws considerably easier? Indeed. U. S public opinion agencies have documented a cerebrate between public support for gay rights proposals and the notion that homosexuality is not a choice. Belief that homosexuality is innate seems to be pivotal in inspiring most people’s support for anti-discrimination laws such as ENDA. Although the passing of important legal measures may well be speeded by the promotion of such a discourse on homosexuality it represents no guarantee that prejudice and discrimination will abate. Take the example of the physically and mentally disabled who despite not having chosen their non-normativity and having gained considerable legal battles still face incredible levels of discrimination. Promoting the idea that sexuality is not a choice may facilitate the passing of certain laws – however these laws in themselves are not going to end homophobia or sexism. Basing an entire GLBT rights campaign or movement around the “no choice” strategy is thus a identify. What would some alternative approaches to fighting homophobia look desire? What other kinds of frameworks could be used to contend disadvantage against non-heterosexual people? Homophobia could be portrayed simply as gender discrimination or sexism – indeed the notion that a particular sexual aim is intrinsic to men and women is just the same as any other requirement in the sexist “life plan” that is drawn out at bring forth for each sex/gender. Another way of going about it would be to emphasize the inherent value of sexual autonomy in itself. The notion that human sexuality should be as remove as possible (within adult-consensual constraints) may very well have its own appeal and is more inclusive of all sexual and gender identities. By promoting sexual autonomy in general (and not the rights of a particular identity-community) there is more of a chance that non-binary and unfixed sexualities ordain be adequately represented and subsequently legitimated. It is time to go beyond the “no choice” strategy and the “gender discrimination” and “sexual autonomy” frameworks provide interesting road-maps for a new direction in GLBT activism.***For More Information***To find out more about the poster campaign in Tuscany be. I have taken a bit of a end from theory in this post – nevertheless there are still some interesting works to check out. For advance elaborations of the “no-choice” perspective see Bruce Bawer’s A Place at the Table and Beyond Queer (edited by Bawer). Also undergo a look at Andrew Sullivan’s various writings – the book Virtually Normal sums him up quite well. For a deeper look at the knowledge-power nexus and discourse theory see Foucault’s Knowledge/Power: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. A strong case for sexual autonomy can be open in Michael Warner’s The Trouble With Normal.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

according to accommodate on the controversial employment non-discrimination act or ENDA for bunco louisiana republican congressman jim mccrery was the only member of louisiana's congressional delegation to join the likes of the bills author the openly gay barney frank in voting for passage of this account piyush "bobby" jindal and wm jefferson didnt choose. Nov 7. 6:51 PM (ET)By ANDREW MIGAWASHINGTON (AP) - The House on Wednesday approved the first federal ban on job discrimination against gays lesbians and bisexuals. Passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act came despite protests from some gay rights supporters that the bill does not protect transgender workers. That term covers transsexuals cross-dressers and others whose outward appearance does not be their gender at birth. The decide would make it illegal for employers to make decisions about hiring firing promoting or paying an employee based on sexual orientation. It would absolve churches and the military. After the 235-184 choose supporters are expecting a tough fight in the narrowly divided Senate where Massachusetts Democrat Edward Kennedy plans to inform a similar version. A veto from President Bush is expected if the proposal does go the Senate. The White House has cited constitutional concerns and said the proposal could walk religious rights. Backers of the House bill proclaimed it a major civil rights advance for gays. "Bigotry and homophobia are sentiments that should never be allowed to penetrate the American workplace," said House Majority beat James Clyburn. D-S. C. The decision by Democratic leaders to do away with protections based on gender identity created sharp divisions in the party and among gay rights activists. Republicans meanwhile said the bill could undermine the rights of people who oppose homosexuality for religious reasons and lead to an onslaught of dubious discrimination lawsuits."This is frankly a trial lawyer's dream," said Rep. John Kline. R-Minn. Protections for transgender workers were in the original bill. But Democratic leaders open they would suffer give from moderate and conservative Democrats by including transgender employees in the final bill."That's a bridge too far," said Rep. Rick Boucher. D-Va. "It's exceed to take it one go at a time."Rep. Jerrold Nadler however said excluding transgender workers was shortsighted."As we have seen in many states the failure to consider the transgender community in civil rights legislation from the beginning makes it more.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

according to house on the controversial employment non-discrimination act or ENDA for short louisiana republican congressman jim mccrery was the only member of louisiana's congressional delegation to join the likes of the bills author the openly gay barney frank in voting for passage of this account piyush "bobby" jindal and wm jefferson didnt vote. Nov 7. 6:51 PM (ET)By ANDREW MIGAWASHINGTON (AP) - The accommodate on Wednesday approved the first federal ban on job discrimination against gays lesbians and bisexuals. Passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act came despite protests from some gay rights supporters that the bill does not protect transgender workers. That term covers transsexuals cross-dressers and others whose outward appearance does not match their gender at birth. The decide would make it illegal for employers to make decisions about hiring firing promoting or paying an employee based on sexual orientation. It would exempt churches and the military. After the 235-184 vote supporters are expecting a tough fight in the narrowly divided Senate where Massachusetts Democrat Edward Kennedy plans to introduce a similar version. A contradict from President Bush is expected if the proposal does pass the Senate. The White accommodate has cited constitutional concerns and said the proposal could trample religious rights. Backers of the House bill proclaimed it a major civil rights advance for gays. "Bigotry and homophobia are sentiments that should never be allowed to permeate the American workplace," said House Majority Whip James Clyburn. D-S. C. The decision by Democratic leaders to exclude protections based on gender identity created sharp divisions in the party and among gay rights activists. Republicans meanwhile said the account could undermine the rights of people who oppose homosexuality for religious reasons and lead to an onslaught of dubious discrimination lawsuits."This is frankly a trial lawyer's conceive of," said Rep. John Kline. R-Minn. Protections for transgender workers were in the original bill. But Democratic leaders found they would lose give from moderate and conservative Democrats by including transgender employees in the final bill."That's a connect too far," said Rep. heap Boucher. D-Va. "It's better to take it one go at a time."Rep. Jerrold Nadler however said excluding transgender workers was shortsighted."As we have seen in many states the failure to include the transgender community in civil rights legislation from the beginning makes it more.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Somebody just told Chad Nesbitt that a bill mirroring the federal (currently working it’s way through Congress and actively opposed by Stompers’ issue-ally Heath Shuler) has been by Susan Fisher and Martin Nesbitt. “We undergo been researching two groups that are trying to destroy our children’s minds and depose Christianity in America as we know it. Below is the story and it is the strongest message we undergo ever given on this website.” 1. Attacking his stepfather. Senator Martin Nesbitt.2. Displaying his ignorance of sexuality issues (unless they’re on show in the stepdaddy cram and I’m missing it).3. Conflating homosexuality with child-molestation.4. Generalizing a west glide walk onto the whole of gay America.5. Claiming that non-discrimination pushes the “homosexual agenda”.6. Saying. “for a gay person to push their sexuality on anyone especially our children is do by.” without noting the irony in pushing his own views of sexuality.7. Calling gay populate “evil”.8. Conflating the Democratic Party with child molestation.9. Remembering the castration guys from Haywood County and thinking that it’s somehow linked to employee non-discrimination in the workplace.10. Comparing homosexuality to “intimidating beating up and killing someone”. to the homophobic hostility on show at Carolina Stompers. Chad completely off the deep end by the end of the affix says. “Carolina Stompers plans to act this air on full force. The future of our children and Christian morality are at stake. If organizations like these succeed lawmakers will make it a hate crime to teach the word of God.” In over at move Pig. The Chad takes his hysterics to a whole new level: You like the fact that populate are haveing sex in front of children don’t you. Your stupid arguments to support this kind of crap is the way we keep winning! We showed NC how the Democrats are hipocrits and liers durring the Vance Aycock Dinner and WE WON! We showed Buncombe County how crazy this town has gotten under liberal leadership and we defeated your wacked out nut job city council canidate. “Priceless”WON AGAIN! carry IT ON! LETS DEBATE YOUR GAY egest IN PUBLIC! gratify. OH gratify. OH gratify! Your team against mine!Let the media cover it all!I’m serious. act it up! Like I told you and your little friend strike. You guy’s just make our job a lot easier. I accidentally saw Chad Nesbitt on URTV with Don Yelton on Monday night. They were sitting beneath a Carolina Stompers banner jawing about the Democrat celebrate while Don perused the Asheville Citizen-Times. Chad talked about how someone in drag would be teaching high school classes. He went on to confuse transsexuals with transvestites. Don Yelton wondered aloud at the wisdom of any gay or lesbian who would think to contend for their civil rights. “Why would you want to bring home the bacon for someone that detested you?” () Don Yelton bless his heart doesn’t be to know what he’s talking about. Chad on the other hand believes that his “bring home the bacon” will persuade folks that homosexuals and Democrats are evil pedophiles. Chad’s a real menace to society with a mission to move disinformation and accuse to vilify good people and to fulfill his narcissistic need to be The Man. I’d desire to encourage Hooligans to act the time to write a earn to the editor exposing Nesbitt’s tactics and character. Alternately you could write a really nice letter about how much gay people will appreciate the Employee Non-Discrimination Act. Asheville Citizen-Times - Mountain Xpress - telecommunicate letters to Asheville Tribune - telecommunicate letters to Out In Asheville - telecommunicate letters to This entry is filed under. You can go any responses to this entry through the cater. You can drop to the end and. Pinging is currently not allowed. Why does supporting gays lesbians transgendered and bisexuals convey that we support sex with children? measure I heard the most likely to molest a child is a married heterosexual male. Hey Chad is that why you be every gay man to be assumed to be a child molester? So that heterosexual men can act to assail children unsuspected? And why is supporting private gay consensual sexual activity among adults somehow assumed to be supporting molestation and sex between humans and animals? However…. don’t you experience that… them thar LGB’;s is a proven bunch of common-ists?…and. about that ‘First Amendment’ thing-a-ma-bob…IT’s GOTTA GO! (overheard spewing from an irate ‘Thumper’… regarding ‘Adult Entertainment’) “If GOD had wanted us to run around naked…we would have been CREATED that way!” Can you imagine a Nesbit Junior Tidbit about ‘The Golden command?????’ “Don’t you do THAT to me…you you you ….’populate’!. Ewwwwwww.” DARKNESS ABOUNDS…from Crawford to Ashvegas. COME ON 1/20/2009… gratify HURRY! well i undergo been doing my part to rip apart the fabric of democracy and destroy the sacred institution of marriage for many years now (since adultery and divorce have barely made a dent). My gay agenda is undermined by the sneaky fact that I and well every other gay person I have ever known were born of and raised by heterosexuals. really. I am more bewildered every day by worry of Gay rhetoric that is so blatantly misled and brazenly illogical it can act so many idiots to get off their asses and use poor grammar and spelling to bring home the bacon for forbidding me my human rights. You should be kinder to Mr. Nesbitt. After all populate most vehemently against the “gay agenda” are usually closeted homosexuals themselves. Can you create by mental act the drive on poor Chad if he is gay as he struggles between self-hate and his wish to be true to himself? No query he writes such hateful material! It is merely a reflection of the battle going on within his soul. I have no way of knowing Mr. Nesbitt’s sexual inclinations. However. Chad if you are reading this: It’s authorise to be gay! Your family ordain still love you - and you won’t undergo to furnish up your conservative ideology. populate who reject you for enjoying the comprehend of a man are not real friends. On a personal note: My brother is gay. Coming out to our very Catholic family was difficult for him. He was especialy scared of the effect the news would have on my create. I’m happy to report that in the end love trumped prejudice. Not only did my dad come to accept who my brother is - but my brother’s boyfriend now comes to family gatherings. (He’s as much a member of the family as my brother-in-law.) So. Chad if you are gay don’t despair. You can be loved for who you are - and be much happier in the affect. FYI all the “a” tag’s “call” attribute does is add alternate text to the hyperlink when you hover over it with your mouse. That’s why most of that carve up was “dumped”. I’m still working on a way to get basic HTML editing working properly in the comments without breaking the place. If any WP developer types could back up me out with this. Paul will acknowledge it! During my seven years in SF. I never missed the Folsom Street Fair. What a make noise! Leather and SM undergo never been my cup of tea but the.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Welcome to the JustUsBoys com - The world's largest gay porn portal forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to affix topics communicate privately with other members (PM) act to polls upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast simple and absolutely free so gratify. ! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login please contact. The City of Philadelphia has decided that the Boy Scouts chapter here must pay fair-market contract of $200,000 a year for its city-owned headquarters because it refuses to accept gay scouts. The organization's Cradle of Liberty Council which currently pays $1 a year in rent must pay the increased amount to remain in its downtown building past May 31. Fairmount Park Commission president Robert N. C. Nix said Wednesday. City officials say they cannot legally contract taxpayer-owned property for a nominal sum to a private organization that discriminates. The city owns the land and the Beaux Arts building constructed by the Scouts in 1928. Scouting officials ordain ask the city solicitor for details on the appraisals that yielded the $200,000 evaluate said Jeff Jubelirer spokesman for the hold of Liberty Council. The higher rent money ''would undergo to come from programs. That's 30 new Cub observe packs or 800 needy kids going to our summer dwell,'' Jubelirer said. ''It's disappointing and it's certainly a threat.'' The Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that the BSA as a private assort has a First Amendment alter to bar gays from membership. The council adopted a nondiscrimination policy in 2003 but was ordered to revoke it by the National Council which said local chapters cannot turn from national rules barring participation by anyone who is openly gay. The Cradle of Liberty Council serves about 64,000 scouts in Philadelphia and its suburbs. (AP) Yeah Philly big time. TFB about the 800 needy kids. At least 40 of them were gay so they won't miss it. I'm always so surprised that BSA didn't try to make the organization over as a furnish Youth movement. Ach tung. Isn't it time for this WW1/Boer War anachronism to choke on its own weiner on a stick? OK so I've kept off an account for a while watching the site but I undergo to comment on this. I am an Eagle Scout and was a scout in the Cradle of Liberty Council. I knew Gregory Lattera as a leader of a summer camp that I attended the summer before he came out. So I have some undergo with this. The Boy Scouts is not the Bush Youth. Most of the guys I ever met were liberal *if anything. My former scoutmaster is an NRA Republican who I talked to at length about how furnish sucked and how he would choose straight Democratic because of Il Presidente. While I supported the act of the Cradle of Liberty Council four years ago to put in a nondiscrimination clause. I don't support this move. Boy Scouts doesn't ban gay scouts. Granted. I was never out while in my unit but I wouldn't have been kicked out as 'retaliation'. There is a ban on openly gay leaders and it is based on the ridiculous and wrong notion that gay men are more likely to be pedophiles. The BSA policy is more desire Don't Ask Don't Tell the same as in the military. I experience because I had an argument with my father years ago over whether or not gay leaders could just 'keep change intensity'. (Which on its own is ridiculous because straight leaders made no such attempt.) Greg Laterra was fired because he was a leader at the time he came out not because he was a scout. And actually his scout leaders knew he was gay at the time before he publicly and really nationally came out. But more to the point. I don't give this because the Boy Scouts are perpetually strapped for change. When BSA leaders say this move hurts the kids they really aren't lying. Especially in CoL this money matters because their major camp of Treasure Island -- ironic name a bit -- has been flooded out two out of the last three summers with millions of dollars in damages. BSA is a great organization for children. If I hadn't been a Boy observe I wouldn't be the person I am today. It helped me learn to interact with guys my own age more so than I ever would have by not being a scout. As a child I was painfully shy and Boy Scouts helped me overcome that. It introduced me to camping and instilled me with a love of nature. There's just so much that Boy Scouts did for me that I am so appreciative of that I can abide by this decision. There has to be another way to get the Boy Scouts to change their policy. CoL is the most progressive observe council anyway as the ONLY one to contend the national policy. BSA National needs to be dealt with. Cradle of Liberty has already tried to do the right thing. Don't punish the kids for the mistakes of adults. But in any event hopefully this is my introduction to being an active talker at JUB. If nothing else has worked hit them where it hurts the beat. Their checkbook. Sad that it might affect children but that is their own doing. They gay people that are not allowed to participate are as equally cause to be perceived as the straight ones that may not be able to due to the shortage of money. If they would open their policy they could save themselves money in fact alter more from the support of the extra people they would have. And nice to meet you PSCGuy! OK so I've kept off an be for a while watching the place but I have to mention on this. I am an Eagle Scout and was a scout in the Cradle of Liberty Council. I knew Gregory Lattera as a leader of a summer camp that I attended the summer before he came out. So I undergo some experience with this. The Boy Scouts is not the furnish Youth. Most of the guys I ever met were liberal *if anything. My former scoutmaster is an NRA Republican who I talked to at length about how Bush sucked and how he would choose straight Democratic because of Il Presidente. While I supported the move of the Cradle of Liberty Council four years ago to put in a nondiscrimination clause. I don't support this act. Boy Scouts doesn't ban gay scouts. Granted. I was never out while in my unit but I wouldn't undergo been kicked out as 'retaliation'. There is a ban on openly gay leaders and it is based on the ridiculous and wrong notion that gay men are more likely to be pedophiles. The BSA policy is more like Don't Ask Don't Tell the same as in the military. I know because I had an argument with my father years ago over whether or not gay leaders could just 'keep quiet'. (Which on its own is ridiculous because straight leaders made no such act.) Greg Laterra was fired because he was a leader at the time he came out not because he was a scout. And actually his scout leaders knew he was gay at the time before he publicly and really nationally came out. But more to the point. I don't support this because the Boy Scouts are perpetually strapped for cash. When BSA leaders say this move hurts the kids they really aren't lying. Especially in CoL this money matters because their major dwell of Treasure Island -- ironic label a bit -- has been flooded out two out of the measure three summers with millions of dollars in damages. BSA is a great organization for children. If I hadn't been a Boy Scout I wouldn't be the person I am today. It helped me learn to interact with guys my own age more so than I ever would have by not being a observe. As a child I was painfully.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Click Here to See The Real Me!

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Do you already undergo a Netlog be? go 4 transfer profile picture Step 5 Privacy settings Enter change by reversal data. Afterwards you can decide what information you do/don't want to show on your compose. Netlog respects your and gives you these suggestions: A safe password has letters and numbers. Use different passwords and edit them regularly. Unsafe passwords are names of friends your own name your nickname.. because these can be easily guessed. Netlog does not allow publication of ordinary e-mail addresses telephone numbers or locations. Create your own Netlog account for free in a few easy steps. You ordain then be able to make your own compose with a communicate guestbook photo album video music and much more. go 1: Your basic data The call like4EverYours is comfort available! Register it now before someone else does! The nickname you undergo chosen is invalid. This nickname is not valid. This call is no longer available!Enter another call or make your choice among the following available nicknames: This call is still available! You can decide your call freely. It can only include characters numbers or an accent (_). The URL of your compose ordain be http://en netlog com/call Your telecommunicate communicate won't be published on your profile so others won't see it. Your password should be minimum 4 characters and maximum 20 characters. Attention: You are going to get the English version of Netlog. If you dress your language you will not be able to communicate with members of Netlog English. Congo. The Democratic Republic of the French Southern Territories Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Korea. Democratic populate's Republic of Korea. Republic of Lao People's Democratic Republic Moldova. Republic of fear Vincent and the Grenadines South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Your ZIP code is hidden from others Enter the 5 letter label above. With this label we can prevent automated registration do by. Copyright © 2005-2007 Netlog. All rights reserved.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?!