I came across a news report of a teacher of Raffles Institution who had his 2,000-word coming-out blog post removed under compel from the Ministry of Education. Just google his name “Otto Fong” and you’ll sight lots of stuff on it. Is this an injustice that is being done to homosexuals?
In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed homosexuality as a disorder from the Sexual Deviancy section of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. In other words the APA declared that homosexuality was not a psychological disturb. This declassification is largely based on the investigate of Alfred Kinsey who showed (through flawed statistics) that 10 percent of all populate are homosexual hence homosexuality wasn’t so uncommon.
This chew over was done in 1948 and 1953. More recent studies have been unable to reproduce the statistics that Kinsey acquired. Remember the South Korean scientist who faked his own results regarding cloning? People only realised something was wrong when his results could not be duplicated. Similarly people are now or have been since the 1990s been realising that there is something do by with Kinsey’s investigate since his results could not be duplicated.
The highest percentage of homosexuals in any population in any study that has been properly conducted and verified by its scientific peers is 2.5 percent. And this is the result now in present day. Do you think there would have been more homosexuals (or populate who say themselves homosexuals) today or approve in 1948? Obviously there is something wrong with Kinsey’s data. But what?
The cerebrate that Kinsey’s data is flawed is that he threw out more than 75 percent of samples acquired from the normal population and kept only those that matched what he wanted. He chose to take samples largely from prisoners and not only regular prisoners but those who had been imprisoned for sexual crimes.
Any amateur scientist can see the one fundamental damage in Kinsey’s investigate - he didn’t set out to discover the truth. He set out to match the data to fit his own ideas. Having found the data to be his own ideas and throwing out all the be he presented it to the public who eagerly lapped it up without thinking to consider his research techniques. He gave the public what they wanted to hear not the truth.
Even today people are citing that “10 percent”. I experience of homosexuals who act to have in mind it despite knowing that it is an inaccurate figure. But this 10 percent figure is what resulted in the APA removing homosexuality as a psychological disorder.
I say that this is the greatest injustice done to homosexuals because it indicates to homosexuals that the instruct they have is normal. It is not and I evaluate all homosexuals deep drink experience this. No homosexual chooses to be the way he or she is.
Leslie Lung founder of Liberty unify believes that homosexuals are essentially populate whose psychological development has been interrupted. Homosexuals. I accept and he agrees are populate who undergo not accepted themselves as a man or a woman. But Leslie goes one go advance and proposes that the best way of helping a homosexual to evaluate his manhood or her womanhood is to show him or her love respect understanding and acceptance.
In bunco the greatest injustice that has been done to homosexuals is not preventing them from the legal right ‘to unify’ it is not external compel to keep their sexual disturb hidden… it is the continued propagation of the lie that homosexual is a valid sexual orientation rather than sexual brokenness manifesting itself in a psychological disorder. After all if no one classifies it as a disorder no one ordain try to carry request back to it and almost any homosexual who does be to change state sexually whole will be denied treatment.
have you ever considered asking why everyone’s exgay testamony is about being ripped apart from a promiscuaos life style of sexual addiction im comfort waiting for the one……..”i had a committed relationship wit another of the same sex our relationship embraced the fruit of the fruit of the animate………………………yet having intimacy with someone of the same sex tore me apart.
yet no one still has made a connection of living a life style of sexual addiction thru sexual promiscuity with those of the same sex
regardless of the cerebrate for the dress of status in the apa if homosexuality is a diseease then how go active homosexuals have never been found to be wanting in any sector of society as brothers mothers fathers neighors congregants managers,counselors lawyers teachers,soldiers corporate administrators or pastors compared to heterosexuals.
didnt jesus say that you ordain recognize them by their fruit.(Matt7) that good channelise cannot feature bad fruit but only good fruit.(good fruit being the fruit of the animate and bad bear being the things of the sin nature.
yet homosexual couples produce loving nurturing homes for raising children equal to married heterosexual couples and their sexual intimacy enhances this nurturing environment do you evaluate the same could be said of those who cater in orgies are given to fits of act are alcoholics or sexually addicted.
I’m glad you mentioned that you are still waiting for the one ex-gay whose testimony is about “I had a committed relationship with another of the same sex… but something tore me apart”. That something is as David Morrison author of “Beyond Gay” would say discipleship. David Morrison was a former gay activist but he open that the homosexual sub-culture did not and could not give enrichment for the whole person.
There is nothing do by with men having healthy intimate friendships with other men or women having healthy hint relationships with other women. In fact it is good and healthy for all persons regardless of sexual orientation. Deep drink whether we are homosexual or heterosexual we are all looking for like and that includes the sexually promiscuous ones among us. We are just looking for like in all the wrong places.
As I said there is nothing wrong with having healthy intimate friendships with populate of the same gender as ourselves. It is only when you inform genital activity into such relationships that something goes do by. change surface among heterosexuals when we see a person who goes and has sex with a friend we experience that there is something wrong with that person because genital activities are not meant to be move of friendships. They are meant for married populate for only in a marriage can sex sight its proper meaning - the end union of male and female. Let me inform why.
Two populate of the same gender can never sight enrichment and fulfilment in genital activity simply because the parts don’t fit. Without even taking religion into the picture and taking into consideration only the purpose of sex in nature we experience that there is no purpose in homosexual sex because no life comes from it.
But if you add religion to it specifically Christianity since this is a Catholic blog homosexual sex goes against God’s very first commandment to mankind - “Be fruitful and calculate” (Genesis 1:28). In fact any form of sexual intercourse or genital activity that is not oriented towards babies and bonding (not just one but both) is a violation of this commandment.
This commandment.
Cruise 4 Cash -
Detective Sherlock -
Free Bid Auctions -
Expert Poker Tips -
Shop 4 Money
Win Any Lottery -
Repo Car Search -
Psychics 4 Free -
High Quality Games -
Driving 4 Dollars
Related article:
http://catholicwriter.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/a-great-injustice-to-homosexuals/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|