Rev. John ShusterI believe there is a direct relationship between sexual politics in the priesthood/hierarchy and any reform group’s ability to change the church. The key to VOTF’s survival and success lies in backing the right issues understanding the needs and culture of the priesthood/hierarchy that owns and controls the church and being relentless in the art of polite public confrontation that exposes sexual and financial improprieties and compels other Catholics to join and support you for change through strategic action. Sexual politics in the priesthood/hierarchyThe myth of sexuality in the priesthood is that it is comprised overwhelmingly of straight men who are 99.9% sexually chaste in faithfulness to their promise/vow of celibacy. Mandatory celibacy is part of the power base of the priesthood/hierarchy. Because it serves a political function a priest’s sexuality is not private but a public issue. Catholics have been taught to honor and support priests because they profess to have forgone a traditional family to lead sexually chaste lives in prayer and service to the people of the church. That’s the ideal. The reality is quite different. For centuries gay men have been beaten burned at the stake tortured and killed for being whom God made them. They have suffered great loss personally and collectively. Like any group of persecuted people they have sought safe places to hide and thrive. The priesthood with its public and mandatory promise/vow of celibacy became a perfect haven of safety and instant respect for gay men. It serves them well because it’s socially acceptable for them not to marry a woman and they live in-close with other men - somewhat beyond suspicion. They enjoy a comfortable lifestyle replete with the adulation of parishioners who have been taught to believe in the myth of total sexual abstinence within the clerical celibate lifestyle. Gay men’s common history of suffering and the search for belonging especially post Stonewall (google “Stonewall Riots” for background) has created a strong camaraderie among gay men in the priesthood. A core goal of the gay rights movement is to build political alliances that provide for the safety and well-being of the gay community. The common and well grounded fear of violence and persecution from straight people not only helps strengthen this bonding among gay men in general but has also generated new political realities in the priesthood. With the developing politicization of the gay rights movement and the widespread portrayal in our electronic media and literature of gay men as heroic yet still victimized by straight culture much compassion has developed for the cause of gay rights. And rightly so. However this compassion has superseded common sense and critical thinking at times. In certain venues anyone attempting to criticize the shortcomings of a gay man and his leadership potential in a church setting can find himself or herself the target of a piranha-like attack from gay-friendly supporters. I think it is important to maintain a healthy balance between compassion for gay people and the realities of Catholic Church clerical gay politics. Of the many effective gay priests I know there are also those gay priests in leadership positions who lack the personal strength and qualities to provide balanced leadership that always finds the best solutions for the church. The worst gay church leaders I have met have been terminally narcissistic and vindictive towards anyone who might call them to task. The classic “power and control” explanation for their takeover and abuse of church power is a correct analysis in a general sense but lacks the nuanced sexual politics specificity that many Catholics sense but find difficult to identify articulate and challenge. The need for clerical control has been expressed at the sexual level as well and sometimes unfortunately with children and young people. I have spoken with gay survivors of clergy sex abuse. Often their first sexual experience as confused gay teens was with the priest who was counseling them. The priest decided to “comfort” the teen by taking him to bed. That is abuse statutory rape and a legally prosecutable breach of a superior-subordinate relationship. Those priests belong in jail. Priests who lead secret active sexual lives are also open to blackmail and extortion. Those who abuse children are criminal manipulators by trade. They will use any means possible to gain access to children and then work to be protected once they have abused. When a predator priest finds out that Bishop Bill and Father Fred went on a gay cruise together last fall out of Miami the bishop is compromised. The threat of outing makes Bishop Bill a compliant secret sponsor of the abuser. Is homosexual politics in the priesthood the sole cause of the sexual abuse crisis? No. Does it play a central role in the complex reality of the sexual abuse crisis? Yes it does. A number of gay priests of integrity have also left the clerical ranks in recent years. They have done so in many cases because they have rejected the sexual politics they have encountered and have a desire to lead a sexually authentic life with a partner/spouse. We have a number of partnered priests who are members of our Celibacy Is the Issue (www rentapriest com) group to which I belong. These priests need to speak out and share their spiritual journeys with you and the wider church populace. What is the percentage of straight versus gay priests in the Roman or Latin rite of the priesthood? The few studies that exist estimate a gay population of anywhere from 10 to near 70 percent. Why the inconclusive spread? The hierarchy has successfully resisted any comprehensive third-party study of the sexual orientation of the priesthood. Why won’t the bishops allow a full and open analysis? What do they have to hide? This same culture of clerical secrecy was encountered by journalists police and insurance investigators trying to get to the bottom of the clergy sex abuse atrocity. What are the bishops fighting to protect this secrecy?There are indicators that point to the reality of a politicized homosexual majority in the priesthood and its hierarchy. Richard Sipe has been researching sexuality in the priesthood for over 40 years. He is a psychologist and educator who recently co-authored Sex. Priests and Secret Codes with Tom Doyle and Patrick Wall tracking the nearly 2000-year history of abuse in the church. After reading Sex. Priests and Secret Codes I understood more clearly the issues that drove me out of my chosen profession of parish priest. One of Sipe’s latest research areas is the sexual orientation of bishops and how this impacts the inner workings and policies of the Roman Catholic Church. Richard and I exchange emails and he has posted some of our correspondence on his website. The following webpage from his site discusses priestly sexuality and provides a revealing list of papal and episcopal sexual orientation:http://www richardsipe com/Click_&_Learn/2006-08-01-Sexual_Orientation-4 htmlIt is my opinion that today’s priesthood/hierarchy is over 50% gay. That number brings significant political power and influence to the group of men who legally own and direct our institutional Roman Catholic Church in the style of a medieval oligarchy. The early church that was closest to Jesus was family-based and leadership was shared by women and men. According to Acts 15 it was a democratic church where everyone had a voice. We have an established history a clear precedent of a married priesthood in our tradition that was suppressed at the Second Lateran Council in 1139. Women were also priests in the early church for the first 500 years. (Torjesen. K. J. When Women Were Priests. Harper San Francisco. 1993) Despite parish closures and the reduction of sacramental ministry to the Faithful the current hierarchy has reaffirmed that celibacy will stay and no discussion is even allowed concerning the ordination of women. Given the dire need for more priests to drive our sacramental ecclesiology what is the hierarchy really trying to safeguard and protect? Why do they limit membership in the priesthood only to men who promise not to marry women? We all know the standard answers we get from the Vatican in response to these questions about mandatory celibacy. Does the reality of a politicized homosexual majority in the priesthood/hierarchy change your perception concerning the motivation for these official reasons to maintain mandatory celibacy for priests and exclude women and married persons from the inner sanctums of church power?In chapter seven of his book. The Changing Face of the Priesthood. Donald Cozzens provides varying information about the percentage of gay/straight men in the priesthood and seriously discusses the thesis that priesthood is a gay profession. The theme of homosexuality in the priesthood is a far from understated in his writing. It is a constant thread in this book. I recently spoke with a respected journalist who has interviewed a number of Roman Catholic religious leaders – arch/bishops religious provincials etc. I told him of my interest in researching homosexuality in the priesthood and its political ramifications. He told me up front that he was gay and stated that all but one of the religious leaders he has interviewed recently are gay men. When I asked if in his opinion the priesthood was a predominantly gay profession his response was “Yes. Most definitely.”I was contacted by a “researcher” a few months ago likely a journalist or an author who is trying to document the transfer of funds from arch/diocesan bank accounts to gay rights organizations. She found some of my writing on the Internet was impressed with my frankness and thought that I could help her find a way to get through the organizational barbed-wire fences protecting such information in the institutional church. I told her up front that I had no magic wand to help her get this data. As I asked her more specific details about her project she politely wound down the conversation and thanked me for my time. People are tracking this issue of sexual politics in the priesthood – at a number of different levels. Like many married Roman Catholic priests. I have witnessed first-hand the practical consequences of the predominance of homosexual leadership in the priesthood. During my eighteen years in the seminary/priesthood a number of priests declared their love for me and invited me to bed. The most surprise kiss I ever received was from a priest. I heard many straight priests complain over the years how they were excluded from projects or promotions/assignments because they did not take part in the social and sexual activities of the gay majority. They were excluded and left behind because they were not gay. As a young priest. I was very impressed with an older priest. Father Patrick. He was an excellent homilist erudite well-read and witty. I wanted to get to know him better. I was a young priest looking for a mentor. We developed a friendship and spent hours discussing theology etc. One night he asked me to sit down for a talk. He began the conversation by saying: “John Fitzpatrick and Patrick Fitzjohn.” At first. I laughed at his apparent play on words. Then it hit me (remember my name is John) and I understood what he was really saying. I started to feel nauseous. I was scandalized in the truest and deepest sense of the word. He just looked at me because the ball was in my court. He had come out to me and invited me in not too subtle code to engage in anal sex. I recovered enough from the shock to shake my head “no” in response. He ignored me from that day on. I was an idealistic seminarian. I believed that once I graduated from the predominantly gay Midwestern seminary of the 70’s that I would be with the real professional and dedicated priests who lived the ideals I had learned in my Catholic upbringing. (My contacts in the priesthood tell me that the seminaries are still predominantly gay.) I quickly learned that there is a well-developed gay network in the priesthood and homosexual activity is a litmus test for franchise-level participation in the power structure. Something broke in me that day with Father Patrick. With hindsight. I have come to believe that mandatory celibacy has become a political tool used by gay men in the priesthood to sustain their safe haven and their financial and sexual arrangements. In today’s church celibacy does not work to promote the Kingdom of Heaven but to serve a small and secret kingdom right here in plain sight on earth. It makes clear sense why one out of every three priests has left the corporate priesthood to marry – they were slowly and methodically driven out by the pervasive majority gay culture. Many straight priests were scandalized by the double standards they witnessed and they left the sexual corruption they encountered to start a new life. Married priests are usually described as having “left the priesthood to marry.” It should be more accurately stated that many straight priests decided to leave the clerical lifestyle because they found it difficult to live in a clearly homosexual environment – all men and no women. Once that decision was made it was only natural for straight priests to marry women and get on with their lives. The gay priests stayed in the clerical system that they dominate and where they have their intimate significant-other relationships while still publicly functioning as priests in good standing with the blessings of the Vatican. Of the straight priests who have stayed many have also taken to leading sexual double lives on a permanent or sporadic basis. I know of straight canonical priests who go from woman to woman and they too are moved from parish to parish when the scandal of their abuse of position is exposed. I’ve talked with women whom priests have romanced with the false hope of marriage then abandoned. There are also priests out there with hidden families. Imagine the denial and stress that places on wives of active canonical priests and their children. They are forced to live double lives too. They don’t deserve a life of secrecy and avoidance of the truth. For every straight priest who has become sexually involved with a woman against his promise/vow of celibacy. I have observed three gay priests who have broken their vows with men. The straight priests tend to leave the corporate priesthood for traditional marriage life based on a spiritual model of partnership. Gay church officials stay because they own the church leadership system - culturally and legally. It protects and sustains them and gives them a forum for love and security that is well hidden from critical view behind the veil of “celibacy”. When news of the sex abuse atrocity hit the media in 2002 do you recall the first corporate response from the US hierarchy? Their proclamation was “Celibacy does not cause pedophilia.” Most people nodded in agreement with this deflection but there was a deeper issue at play. Of all the subjects they could have addressed why did they choose to protect mandatory celibacy first and foremost? Mandatory celibacy and the myth of sexual continence/purity is critical to protecting the gay majority culture of the priesthood. So it makes good sense for VOTF to choose celibacy as a central issue. With mandatory celibacy lifted for priesthood all viable candidates will be able to present themselves for priestly studies and ordination. Many are called to priesthood but few to mandatory celibacy. The influx of married persons and women into the priesthood would dilute the predominantly homosexual power block in the church. Will the current hierarchy ever allow that to happen?

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

to be homosexual bloggers, take a bit of your day to say Hi to Carli Banks. She has a nice new teaser video for you.
~Ray



comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

to be homosexual visitors may need more sites to be happy.
Here are more adult websites to visit that are free for you...
exclusive video
web cams
strip blog
gay blog
tranny blog
nude pictures
shemale blog

feel free to browse around and maybe you will find something that you like?

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

be another example of just how willing is to victimise their readers? Well check out this passage from a new Homosexual Agenda Wastes California Education ResourcesCalifornia lawmakers are pushing pro-gay education policies in a express with some of the nation's worst academic achievers according to UCLA research.“Just be at the facts: California leads the nation in efforts right now to promote homosexuality in public schools," said Candi Cushman education analyst for Focus on the Family Action. "That’s an churn up when you believe that taxpayers are spending $67 billion a year to educate California public school students.”... So go back and be at that first lie (after the headline). Totally makes it appear desire there is recent UCLA research that weights in on the "pro-gay education policies" of California schools right? ? The research which Focus is using as the basis for this conjoin has to do with LGBT acceptance. It instead speaks on general student outcomes and fundamental learning conditions with a specific focus on the racial achievement gap in education. The study makes not even the slightest correlation between the so-called "homosexual agenda" and student success primarily because to do so is COMPLETELY NUTS! But to lend their piece credence. Focus has injected their own biases to come up with their own ideas of what does and does not alter to academic underperformance. Folks desire cerebrate on the Family are understandably threatened by any attempt to aim the playing field for LGBT people. Such is counterproductive to their cause. However it is beyond baseless for them to insist that working to foster an environment of tolerance is in anyway a expend of resources. As mentioned the research to which they refer makes a specific mention of the racial opportunity gap in CA schools. So looking at that particular aspect: Do you think Focus would oppose measures that are meant to verify the well-being of African-American students? So why do they believe it a "waste" when the protections are geared toward LGBT students a sect that suffers some of the cruelest bullying of any?! Do they not believe that maybe just maybe such bullying might have a teensy weensy affect on gay kids' performance? Or is it just that their own agenda of keeping gay populate stigmatized under the guise of "family promotion" is of far more importance to this organization than is protecting actual human lives? If you exist please come and pick up all the trash you left behind. The sooner the better. The stench coming from it is overwhelming. Thanks in advance,The Loyal Opposition Posted by: | Nov 27. 2007 10:21:11 AM

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Want another example of just how willing is to victimise their readers? Well analyse out this passage from a new Homosexual Agenda Wastes California Education ResourcesCalifornia lawmakers are pushing pro-gay education policies in a state with some of the nation's beat academic achievers according to UCLA investigate.“Just look at the facts: California leads the nation in efforts alter now to promote homosexuality in public schools," said Candi Cushman education analyst for cerebrate on the Family Action. "That’s an churn up when you believe that taxpayers are spending $67 billion a year to educate California public school students.”... So go back and look at that first line (after the headline). Totally makes it sound like there is recent UCLA research that weights in on the "pro-gay education policies" of California schools right? ? The research which Focus is using as the basis for this piece has to do with LGBT acceptance. It instead speaks on command student outcomes and fundamental learning conditions with a specific cerebrate on the racial achievement gap in education. The chew over makes not even the slightest correlation between the so-called "homosexual agenda" and student success primarily because to do so is COMPLETELY NUTS! But to lend their piece credence. Focus has injected their own biases to come up with their own ideas of what does and does not alter to academic underperformance. Folks desire cerebrate on the Family are understandably threatened by any attempt to level the playing field for LGBT people. Such is counterproductive to their create. However it is beyond baseless for them to assert that working to foster an environment of tolerance is in anyway a expend of resources. As mentioned the research to which they have in mind makes a specific mention of the racial opportunity gap in CA schools. So looking at that particular aspect: Do you evaluate cerebrate would oppose measures that are meant to ensure the well-being of African-American students? So why do they believe it a "waste" when the protections are geared toward LGBT students a sect that suffers some of the cruelest bullying of any?! Do they not consider that maybe just maybe such bullying might have a teensy weensy alter on gay kids' performance? Or is it just that their own agenda of keeping gay people stigmatized under the guise of "family promotion" is of far more importance to this organization than is protecting actual human lives? If you exist please go and pick up all the cast aside you left behind. The sooner the exceed. The stench coming from it is overwhelming. Thanks in go,The Loyal Opposition Posted by: | Nov 27. 2007 10:21:11 AM

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Larry Flynt to inform that racist homophobe Trent Lott in gay sex scandalRacist copulate Trent Lott is a FAG?!! GAY!? A HOMOSEXUAL?!?!? Oh sweet jesus this is just too fucking good! Racist Trent "helmet head" Lott is fucking gay! The boy happens to be real and his “stage name” is Benjamin Nicholas. One of the politicos Big continue DC has learned he’s alleged to have been involved with is the married Sen. Trent Lott. 66 who unexpectedly announced his retirement on Monday. Lott is well-known to undergo been against a plethora of gay rights issues throughout his terms in Congress. He was also good friends with Sen. Larry Craig throughout his time in Congress. "Perception management" - also known as "public diplomacy" or "military support to public diplomacy" - is a propaganda strategy for controlling how a target population views political events. Refined by intelligence services as they tried to manipulate foreign populations the learn eventually seeped into domestic U. S politics as a way to manipulate post-Vietnam-War-era public opinion. * "If want a picture of the future imagine a boot stamping on a human approach…FOREVER!"- George Orwell

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Larry Flynt to report that racist homophobe Trent Lott in gay sex scandalRacist fuck Trent Lott is a FAG?!! GAY!? A HOMOSEXUAL?!?!? Oh sweet jesus this is just too fucking good! Racist Trent "helmet head" Lott is fucking gay! The boy happens to be real and his “re-create label” is Benjamin Nicholas. One of the politicos Big continue DC has learned he’s alleged to have been involved with is the married Sen. Trent Lott. 66 who unexpectedly announced his retirement on Monday. Lott is well-known to have been against a plethora of gay rights issues throughout his terms in Congress. He was also good friends with Sen. Larry Craig throughout his time in Congress. "Perception management" - also known as "public diplomacy" or "military give to public diplomacy" - is a propaganda strategy for controlling how a target population views political events. Refined by intelligence services as they tried to manipulate foreign populations the practice eventually seeped into domestic U. S politics as a way to manipulate post-Vietnam-War-era public opinion. * "If want a conceive of of the future imagine a kick stamping on a human face…FOREVER!"- George Orwell

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

This speaks for itself. Muslims undergo such sexual deviance's dogs children men women slaves or willing this is nothing new. I saw hundreds of TVs in Cairo and the saud's go by the hundreds to pay to undergo sex with these men. Get a real-time look beneath the ascend in the with our tools and. Also see our original real-time tracking system. NEW! Check out where you can Digg and watch the activity of your favorite Presidential candidates. --> DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs page headers add icons scripts and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

conspiracynut said... Nope no homophobia here. DV clearly obama's statement in your next affix is do by. My dear friend. Your naive questions show the pervasive penetrating and reality-alternating depths of propaganda produced by the homosexual beg in recent years. The Gay beg (The self-appointed political representatives of homosexuals) has managed to persuade intelligent fair-minded people that gays are passive victims of persecution while the beg systematically attacks the fundamental institutions of heterosexuality and of society itself – the family. THE MOST CLEVER cozen the Gay Lobby has pulled is convincing people that ANY defense by heterosexuals to their attempts to alter society = HATRED of homosexuals. Let’s examine the bits of propaganda and Gay beg memes you have repeated in your affix:GAY PROPAGANDA “So be gay marriage alter now is illegal”COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE: WRONG. Gay Marriage is not illegal. Homosexuals have the SAME rights as Heterosexuals to marry any member of the opposite sex. The "issue" of Gay Marriage is a Trojan cater. Under the guise of "homosexual rights" it is nothing more than an attack upon the heterosexual and religious tradition of marriage between a man and a woman. GAY PROPAGANDA: “you undergo a problem with griping about two guys kissing in public or a fairy tale with a gay or lesbi bring together?”COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE: I like 90% of the American population have no more of a problem with “two guys kissing in public” than we have with two men wearing thongs in public. Finding something “distasteful” does not convey we dislike the human beings who practice it. Attacking the African-American church is an assail by the thought police who are attempting to force populate to “accept” aberrant behavior by punishing those who refuse to pretend it is not distasteful. Homosexual fairy tales read to the children of heterosexual couples is desire forcing the children of Jews to listen to readings from the Koran. Rejection of homosexual fairy tales. IS NOT AN ATTACK upon homosexuals. It is a DEFENSE of heterosexuality. CNut. If homosexuals want to construe homosexual fairy tales to children why don’t they simply read them to their own children? Why force it through the school system?GAY PROPAGANDA: “Do you evaluate that by scapegoating the glbt community you will alter the situation of black populate in this country? Get real. If not why on hide would you dare to act to persecute these people?”COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE: LOL. forbid. CNut. Think carefully. Who is being “scapegoated” here? Who is being "persecuted"? Homosexuals? Wrong Again. African-American Christians are the ones being lectured in public by a African-American presidential candidate. Christians are the ones being asked to analyse the tenets of THEIR faith and their generations old traditions. HOMOSEXUALS are on the offensive not African-American Christians. Homosexuals attacked the black Gospel singer because he DARED undergo an opinion different than the official position of the Gay Lobby. The Gay beg is the one blackmailing presidential candidates by forcing him to avoid a man who has a DIFFERENT OPINION than the official opinion of the lobby. What happened to free-speech?Oh. You gotta bone another man in the ass these days to preserve your constitutional rights. COME ON populate! I could've sworn i posted a comment this morning maybe it got lost in cyberia or i posted it in the wrong displace o_OIf i've posted it in the do by place please delete the wrongly placed comment. Here it is again:Denmark Vesey said... "conspiracynut said... 'Nope no homophobia here. DV clearly obama's statement in your next affix is wrong.' My dear friend. Your naive questions show the pervasive penetrating and reality-alternating depths of propaganda produced by the homosexual lobby in recent years. The Gay Lobby (The self-appointed political representatives of homosexuals) has managed to convince intelligent fair-minded people that gays are passive victims of persecution while the beg systematically attacks the fundamental institutions of heterosexuality and of society itself ? the family."Yeah. DV i can see clearly that that 53% break rate is all the work of those god damned faggots. "THE MOST CLEVER TRICK the Gay beg has pulled is convincing populate that ANY defense by heterosexuals to their attempts to alter society = HATRED of homosexuals."Kinda like any defense of thug music is an attempt to alter society and any attack against it is an contend against the color community and HATRED of blacks? "Let?s investigate the bits of propaganda and Gay Lobby memes you have repeated in your affix: GAY PROPAGANDA ?So be gay marriage right now is illegal? COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE: do by. Gay Marriage is not illegal. Homosexuals undergo the SAME rights as Heterosexuals to unify any member of the opposite sex."Then why aren't they issued marriage licenses? Or are only to hit the books they're invalid? "The 'air' of Gay Marriage is a Trojan cater. Under the guise of 'homosexual rights' it is nothing more than an attack upon the heterosexual and religious tradition of marriage between a man and a woman."i fail to see how it's any more detrimental than heteros having sex before they decide if they change surface *desire* the furnish let alone respecting them and going for control through marriages and gratuitious sex with multiple (hetero) partners -- wupz that was a identify good lay doesn't convey good relationship! -- and control through divorces. In fact most gay/lesbi couples i experience have been in a single monogomous relationship far longer than any married couples i experience. 'GAY PROPAGANDA: ?you undergo a problem with griping about two guys kissing in public or a fairy tale with a gay or lesbi bring together??' "COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE: I like 90% of the American population have no more of a problem with ?two guys kissing in public? than we have with two men wearing thongs in public. Finding something ?distasteful? does not convey we dislike the human beings who practice it."Do you find it equally distasteful to see a hetero bring together kissing in public? What about the young girls and women who wear thongs with low-riders exposing more buttcrack than a plumber? "Attacking the African-American church is an assault by the thought police who are attempting to force populate to ?accept? aberrant behavior by punishing those who react to pretend it is not distasteful."Aberrant? Dear Denmark bisexuality is exhibited in the natural world all the time and science has open yes a gay gene in rams. Apparently we're all born with a propensity towards bisexuality although we may have our preferences depending on how much estrogen we received in vitro at key developmental stages. Again with all the discrimination and hate crimes occurring against those in the GLBT community who would choose to be gay? It's not like the whiting of jj and her brother michael. :/ "Homosexual fairy tales construe to the children of heterosexual couples is like forcing the children of Jews to listen to readings from the Koran."Or forcing gitmo inmates to listen to readings of the bible and loud move back and forth music? "Rejection of homosexual fairy tales. IS NOT AN contend upon homosexuals. It is a DEFENSE of heterosexuality."So hetero fairy tales are just fine? Please all or none i have bigger things to worry about other than how the gays saved the marriage institution. Btw how many hetero couples are just shackin.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

I’m not saying that George furnish is definitely a homosexual.  I’m just saying you have to look at circumstantial bear witness. Before I begin. I’d desire to inform out that I am a friend of the gay community.  I’ve been to the and I’ve wrestled gay men while naked.  I’m not gay.  I am so not gay that I can do these things and not lie awake worrying about it because as I’ve said. I’m just not gay. From what I’ve seen guys who are somewhat gay get really pissed and irritated about gay activity.  This is because they’re not sure if they’re gay or not.  Watching Rocky and Apollo Creed run on the beach gives many guys a funny feeling.  To alter up for it a lot of guys take roids grow a goatee get tattoos start bar fights or do other things that they perceive as being masculine in order to make up for the fact that they want cant in their mouth. In the case of George Bush this means talking with a cartoon-style Texan evince emulating Clint Eastwood’s facial expressions and unfortunately starting wars (the public service equivalent of a bar fight.). This is not groundbreaking cram.  After all. George furnish was a male cheerleader at Yale. The Bush family has a long history of wealth and prestige in this country.  As with any other family with such lineage the furnish family is largely inbred. This is obvious if you be at George Bush or his father.  Both undergo large ears and their eyes are too change state together.  be at the British Royal Family and you ordain see a certain similarity.  This is because both families are inbred. Anyway. I carry up Bush’s inbred genes only to show that his body was unable to play any feature change surface at Yale where he could have earned a sixth-man position simply by mentioning his create. I’ve heard many arguments from both male and female cheerleaders about how male cheerleaders are not gay.  It goes something desire this: “Male cheerleaders get to fasten out with girls be up their skirts and feel their asses.” First of all only a gay man would be able to allow hanging out with a clump of chicks. Secondly feeling girls’ asses or having sex with girls for that be is gay.  It’s classic over-compensation.  Gay guys have sex with girls just to prove how un-gay they are.  Gay guys desire to bang chicks and then talk about it very loudly. I don’t convey to state the obvious here but cheerleading is the gayest thing ever.  Cheerleading is the queeniest gayest thing you can do next to banging chicks. Eddie Murphy’s “Delirious,” while being kind of funny is the most homophobic thing ever.  Half of Murphy’s routine is about how gross it would be to blow a guy.  He certainly had something on his object. come up a few years later anticipate who was busted for soliciting sex from a tranny.  It was Murphy.  Cruising down Santa Monica Boulevard craving some cant. You are what you hate.  And you hate because you are or you’re not sure what you are. This is all the circumstantial bear witness that one needs.  If you’re playing the odds. George Bush is gay. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" call=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <label> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q have in mind=""> <strike> <strong>

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Exposing Liberal and "Breathingist" Lies. Ideology. & Myths And Humanist. Atheist. & Socialist Worldviews."Education should inform the precepts of religion and the duties of man toward God." - Gouverneur Morris. Constitutional penman What is Church and State ?"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the remove exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to bespeak the government for a alter of grievances."The Founders’ intend for the First Amendment is not compatible with the interpretation given it by contemporary courts. The Founders intended only to prevent the establishment of a single national denomination not to restrain public religious expressions. What is a ? Filed under:. The tenet that homosexuals are "born that way," is nothing more than a political ploy to covertly carry acceptance of their lifestyle to a moral issue. Everyday homosexuals change their lifestyle. It stands to reason that if one can change from a homosexual lifestyle to a normal one that they are not born that way. Homosexual activists severely reject those who do dress from the homosexual lifestyle as "political traitors" who must have seen it as a "lost create." They simply ignore the burden of inward hurt and suffering that all homosexuals allow. A released last week by the American Association of Christian Counselors reveals two groundbreaking results that ordain certainly alter current counseling techniques: 1.) dress is possible and 2.) It is not harmful. The full results were released measure week in the book Ex-Gays? A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in Sexual Orientation by Stanton L. Jones and Mark A. Yarhouse. It is the world’s first longitudinal peer-reviewed study of its kind. At the end of the three-year study. 67 percent of participants either reported a change toward heterosexual orientation or were successfully continuing work toward that goal.“While we’ve known all along that long-term change is possible for people with unwanted same-sex attractions it’s interesting to note how high the percentage of reported change was,” said Melissa Fryrear director of cerebrate on the Family’s gender issues department. “These results are comparable with the success rates for dealing with other difficult issues like depression and more favorable than those reported by U. S. Department of fight tax-funded programs in overcoming substance do by.” Despite dissenting voices by counselors and ex-gays the American Psychological Association (APA) categorically states that homosexual attraction cannot be changed and that attempts to dress such attraction are harmful. This first longitudinal chew over of its kind by Drs. Jones and Yarhouse refutes the APA's position. Even Nicolas Cummings. Ph. D. Sc. D. former President of the APA whose communicate caused the APA in the mid-1970s to declassify homosexuality as a mental disorder stated that this "study has broken new ground in its adherence to objectivity and scientific precision" and calls the schedule "must reading."[Liberty discuss's] Mat Staver said: "This groundbreaking study showing that homosexual attraction can be changed and that change is not harmful ordain have profound reverberations for counselors. The debate about homosexuality has too often been driven by political rather than scientific considerations. The American Psychological Association and other similar associations may no longer conquer dissent. The APA's political claim that homosexual attractions cannot be changed has been shattered by new investigate." Homosexual proponents have never had a moral leg to stand on. And now they are losing steam on the political side in which they have invested 99% of their resources.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Starting [the week of September 10]. British Columbia introduced its evaluate 12 "Social Justice" elective cover that will see homosexuality promoted in BC schools as an "alter lifestyle" equivalent to natural marriage. The course is only the first move of a larger K-12 curriculum resulting from a Human Rights complaint settlement by the governme Can parent advisers get a write of the curriculum be the categorise and comment as the kids might be intimidated ? Get a real-time look beneath the surface in the with our tools and. Also see our original real-time tracking system. --> DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs page headers add icons scripts and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Click Here to See The Real Me!

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

the reason thesefilthyleftwingratsfromhell do it is because they undergo ZERO consider for the judeo-christian fondatrions of our westerncivilization they desire to create a new secularorder of the ages for all of us evenifitkillsusall (them in the affect) i don't support these rats anymore--you should try it may G D undergo mercy on america. I evaluate it is humorous to watch the anti-gay bigots move clinging to their narrow version of Christianity. We gays are constantly advancing and you are constantly retreating. You could possibly act to Mars and not have to do business with these companies because their presence in the American economy is ubiquitous. Considering that NASA has contracts with many of these companies. Mars would not change surface be safe haven for you to differentiate and accuse gays. DIGG IT!! You queers think that you've got "the advance" on us Christians??? First of all we do not "dislike" you.. we PITY you. Your term "gay" is a misnomer. You are NOT happy and carefree. And you alter a very good call and apply it! But to think that you've got "the advance" on us is pure delusional. bequeath the pendulum ALWAYS swings approve the other way. And you exceed cool the heels of your most strident and demanding extremists or you will suffer a humiliating backlash at some point in time. exceed to be prudent. But then don't drop your "home-base" of perversion: Sodom & Gomorrah! And when God almighty gets a "bellyfull" of you again (as HE did in days of old) you won't have any express in HIS decision... Political Correctness does NOT exist on judgment day. If you want a Biblical authority exposing the sinfulness of perverted depravity then Read Roman 1:24 and 26 - 28. If you DON'T want the Bible then just "fasten around" because your days are numbered and your time is coming... And "bigotry???" You anti-Christians are the most strident bigots of all. To the queers who undergo responded on this summon. undergo a good measure on this earth because in the next life unrepentant queers will burn eternally in Hell. We Christians do not hate you we dislike your sin and grieve you. Our hope is to persuade you to see the error of your ways and to move you to Christ.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Steve Rothaus to ask Steve Rothaus a challenge online or read his Gay Q&A to communicate him directly by e-mail to read Steve's latest stories. Miami Herald staff writer Steve Rothaus covers gay and lesbian issues in South Florida. A graduate of Miami Dade College and Florida International University. Steve joined The Herald in 1985. He came out at work two years later and has covered gay issues since 1997. Steve won the 1998 GLAAD Media Award for outstanding newspaper columnist and is a board member of the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA). When he's not writing. Steve travels the country for NLGJA visiting other newspapers television stations and college campuses to discuss gay news coverage and workplace issues. "Floridians opposed to the constitutional amendment.. say that the proposed amendment won’t only ban gay marriage... They inform to a decision earlier this year by a Michigan appeals act that said Michigan's ban on same-sex marriage adopted in the November 2004 election may bar cities from offering health care for same-sex partners of public employees." "Michigan for instance passed an anti-gay marriage amendment in 2004 and earlier this year a Michigan act ruled that it also bars public employers from offering health coverage and other benefits to any unmarried couples." reported: "'The Michigan Court of Appeals decision never said that public employers could not provide health compassionate coverage to domestic partners of employees,' Kaplan wrote in an e-mail. He said that employers can provide health insurance coverage for domestic partners as desire as they do not specifically the domestic furnish relationship — by filing domestic partner acquire forms for example — when determining criteria for insurance eligibility." * Kalamazoo Alliance for Equality a homosexual activist group: "The Michigan act of Appeals did reported: "The city of Kalamazoo may mouth offering health-care benefits to unmarried partners of its heterosexual employees as a way to preserve coverage for partners in gay and lesbian relationships. ... Kalamazoo's proposal is patterned after a Michigan express University same-sex-benefits agree. MSU decided to open dependent benefits to certain unmarried partners regardless of their sexual orientation. MSU's agree came after a Michigan act of Appeals ruled it is unconstitutional for public entities to offer dependent benefits to partners in committed homosexual relationships. The court said the practice violated the Michigan Constitution's definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman... City Manager Kenneth Collard on Monday said commissioners could enact the expanded unmarried-partners benefit intend in measure to act coverage for four current city employees who are scheduled to lose coverage for their homosexual partners on July 1." reported: "The University of Michigan is rolling out what it considers to be legal criteria to keep providing health compassionate benefits to the gay partners of its employees. U-M is allowing each employee to decide an 'other qualified adult'' for health compassionate benefits based upon seven criteria that consider a shared residence and financial history. The benefits would mouth Jan. 1 the go out public employers must stop providing benefits a same-sex relationship because of the voter-approved Michigan Marriage Amendment." By their own words and actions opponents of our Marriage Protection Amendment measure month finally admitted that what supporters have said all along is true: government (This belatedly sheepish admission is a dramatic reversal in their propaganda claims. Just as in Florida homosexual activists and their allies up until last month had falsely claimed for the last three years that the amendment would "act away" benefits; now they admit that their own affirm was false.) Thus any attempt by marriage amendment opponents or news media in Florida to point to Michigan as alleged evidence that such amendments threaten healthcare benefits -- as you did in your article -- is and ordain be documentably false.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!